Teams

LCTA (A) 4.0M 65 & Over (Claussen)

Other Mixed Doubles 65 & Over Adult · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-27vs LCTA65/Lee/MPRLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Claussen / Robert Bertolini vs Charlotte Gerber / Tom Cunneff3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLeonard Douglas / Doris Glaz vs John Lester / Debra Mulholland7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-14vs LCTA65/Lee/MPRWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusie Peiffer / Gary Batts vs John Lester / Debra Mulholland4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeonard Douglas / Lori Claussen vs Bo McNinch / Amy Kelly4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnita Greene / Kenneth Pugno vs Charles Lee / Charlotte Gerber6-1, 6-3
2026-06-07vs LCTA65/Lee/MPRWon 21
L#1 DoublesLori Claussen / Robert Bertolini vs Charles Lee / Charlotte Gerber4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusie Peiffer / Gary Batts vs Bo McNinch / Janine Dalva6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnita Greene / Leonard Douglas vs John Lester / Debra Mulholland6-2, 7-6
2026-05-31vs LCTA65/Lee/MPRLost 12
W#1 DoublesBarbara Pinkerton / Kenneth Pugno vs Debra Mulholland / John Lester4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLola Bradshaw / Robert Bertolini vs Janine Dalva / Bo McNinch6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGenevieve McCutcheon / Richard Weathers vs Amy Kelly / Tom Cunneff6-7, 1-6
2026-05-22vs LCTA65/Lee/MPRWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnita Greene / Leonard Douglas vs Tom Cunneff / Constance Moynihan6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusie Peiffer / Gary Batts vs Garrett Riggins / Debra Mulholland6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLori Claussen / Roy Gum vs Janine Dalva / Charles Lee6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Gary Batts
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
Anita Greene
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.91
Susie Peiffer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Genevieve McCutcheon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Jack Barker
published
3.68
Richard Weathers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Robert Bertolini
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Barbara Pinkerton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Leonard Douglas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
Doris Glaz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Lola Bradshaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kenneth Pugno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lori Claussen
published
Roy Gum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Ennis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susie Peiffer + Gary Batts303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gary Batts
45W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Anita Greene
10W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Susie Peiffer
48W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
Genevieve McCutcheon
62W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.88
Jack Barker
38W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
Richard Weathers
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Robert Bertolini
73W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Barbara Pinkerton
44W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
Leonard Douglas
30W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Doris Glaz
46W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
65%35%<1%
3.45
Lola Bradshaw
35W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.31
Kenneth Pugno
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Claussen
41W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Roy Gum
10W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
William Ennis
19W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.