Teams

MS/Byrd/Gulf Coast

2025 Adult 70 & Over Multi-State Championship · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-03vs AR/Norby/Brunk/HSVLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerry Gene Cook / Ron Carstens vs Randy Bruno / Richard Jandl5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Wilkinson / Thomas Holder vs Dan Bowholtz / Douglas Hicks7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHap Davis / William Wilburn vs Chas Brunk / Larry Dye6-7, 1-6
2025-05-02vs AL/ReasnerWon 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Wilburn / Terry Gene Cook vs T Thompson / Gary Irwin2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Wilkinson / Hap Davis vs Geoffrey Haynes / Richard Salling6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Stanovich / Ron Carstens vs Fred Burkert / Daniel Fulton6-2, 7-5
2025-05-01vs LA/BoydLost 12
L#1 DoublesReuben Byrd / Thomas Holder vs Parry Thomas / Jay Boyd2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Wilkinson / David Stanovich vs Robert Lettow / Rick Holland6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRon Carstens / Terry Gene Cook vs John Williams / Robert Burleson6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-05-01vs KS/BauerfeldWon 21
L#1 DoublesThomas Holder / William Wilburn vs Robert Roth / Roderick Harley1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHap Davis / John Wilkinson vs Timothy McManus / James Pigg7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Stanovich / Ron Carstens vs Mark Nordstrom / Brad Smith6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
David Stanovich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Ron Carstens
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
Reuben Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Terry Gene Cook
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Hap Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Holder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
William Wilburn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reuben Byrd + Terry Gene Cook2538% games+9.5% vs expected
Ron Carstens + Terry Gene Cook033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Stanovich
35W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Ron Carstens
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Reuben Byrd
30W–64L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Terry Gene Cook
4W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Hap Davis
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Holder
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Wilburn
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.