Teams

BHSC Solo Slayers

2022 Charlottesville Singles · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-03Lost 01
L#3 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Susan Wall6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-10-24vs BHSC HapgoodWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Taggart vs Pascale Hapgood6-3, 7-5
2022-10-17vs Forest Lakes SanfordWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Taggart vs Stephanie Hall6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-03vs Forest Lakes SanfordWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Taggart vs Lisa Jackson6-3, 7-6
W#3 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Judy Roy6-4, 7-6
2022-09-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Taggart vs Lisa Jackson6-2, 6-2
2022-09-19vs BHSC HapgoodWon 10
W#3 SinglesAnita McGinty vs Maritza Johnson6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Melissa Hoover
published
3.22
Amy Taggart
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.22
Courtney Heyward
published 3.5
3.11
Anita McGinty
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Jeanne Ward
published
2.85
Patricia Irby
published
2.74
Abbie Oliver
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Hoover
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Amy Taggart
142W–98L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Courtney Heyward
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Anita McGinty
73W–56L career · 3 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jeanne Ward
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
Patricia Irby
10W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Abbie Oliver
49W–55L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.