Teams

Mu’s team

2025 40&Over Men · 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.80 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-17vs Western: SageLost 03
L#1 DoublesKamu Pindiprolu / Jad Fares vs Gordy Sage / Ashley Chung2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesThomas Majerski vs Rob Udy0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKofi Fynn-Aikins / Saby George vs Alexander Shotell / Ronald White0-6, 2-6
2025-07-03vs Western: SageLost 13
L#1 DoublesKamu Pindiprolu / Jim Higgins vs Gordy Sage / Ashley Chung2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesFelix Cheng vs Jim Texter2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGlenn Snowden / Kofi Fynn-Aikins vs Timothy Prise / Carl DiNatale2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJason Galbraith / BISWAJIT ROY vs Alexander Shotell / Ashvin Tadakamalla6-4, 6-1
2025-06-26vs Western: SageLost 04
L#1 DoublesJames Glennon / Chris Cardillo vs Gordy Sage / Sanjeev Relan1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBISWAJIT ROY vs Rob Udy2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKamu Pindiprolu / Sergio Quevedo vs Alexander Shotell / Ronald White3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYang Xiao / Kofi Fynn-Aikins vs Timothy Prise / Turhan Wilbon4-6, 4-6
2025-06-19vs Western: SageLost 13
L#1 DoublesJames Glennon / Jad Fares vs Gordy Sage / Sanjeev Relan0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBISWAJIT ROY vs Ronald White4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSergio Quevedo / Jim Higgins vs Alexander Shotell / Timothy Prise6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChris Cardillo / Kofi Fynn-Aikins vs Turhan Wilbon / Rob Udy0-6, 0-6
2025-06-12vs Western: SageLost 04
L#1 DoublesJames Glennon / BISWAJIT ROY vs Carl DiNatale / Sanjeev Relan3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChris Cardillo vs Jim Texter0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJason Galbraith / Thomas Majerski vs Gordy Sage / Alexander Shotell4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSergio Quevedo / Yang Xiao vs Timothy Prise / Turhan Wilbon5-7, 1-6
2025-06-05vs Western: SageLost 13
L#1 DoublesKamu Pindiprolu / Glenn Snowden vs Timothy Prise / Ashvin Tadakamalla3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSergio Quevedo vs Rob Udy1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJim Higgins / Yang Xiao vs Ronald White / Sanjeev Relan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Glennon / Chris Cardillo vs Jim Texter / Ashley Chung1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Sage062049131
2Mu’s team0642042268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
BISWAJIT ROY
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Felix Cheng
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.63
Saby George
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Glenn Snowden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Yang Xiao
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
James Glennon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Jason Galbraith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Sergio Quevedo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.33
Thomas Majerski
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Kamu Pindiprolu
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Chris Cardillo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jad Fares
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Ulatowski
published
Jim Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kofi Fynn-Aikins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Murray Richardson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kamu Pindiprolu + Jim Higgins1736% games+4.6% vs expected
Jason Galbraith + Thomas Majerski6655% games+3.4% vs expected
Kamu Pindiprolu + Sergio Quevedo1735% games+0.6% vs expected
James Glennon + Chris Cardillo0523% games−11.3% vs expected
Jim Higgins + Sergio Quevedo0531% gamesnot enough data
James Glennon + Glenn Snowden134 matchesnot enough data
Jason Galbraith + Felix Cheng224 matchesnot enough data
Kamu Pindiprolu + James Glennon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
BISWAJIT ROY
13W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
Felix Cheng
26W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Saby George
33W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Glenn Snowden
28W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Yang Xiao
101W–78L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
James Glennon
67W–97L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
Jason Galbraith
103W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Sergio Quevedo
51W–95L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Thomas Majerski
30W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Kamu Pindiprolu
58W–115L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Chris Cardillo
5W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Jad Fares
29W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Ulatowski
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Higgins
50W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kofi Fynn-Aikins
32W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Murray Richardson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.