Teams

CDTA S 18&OM3.0 3.RT Ciuca Sun 6 $27

1Summer 18&O WN · WE

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesFilip Kempa / Tyler Hattery vs Abe Reese / Jonathan Essig6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMateo Velasco / Justin Larson vs Daniel Halperin / Christian Trujillo2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesFilip Kempa vs Bernardo Hees7-5, 1-1
W#3 DoublesSebastian Schoyer / David Johnsen vs C Haid / Evan Schaffer6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesFilip Kempa / Tyler Hattery vs Yutong Li / Dylan Wodrich7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTJ Billard vs Branden Schmitt1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJansen Gough / Ciprian Robu vs Nicholas Thompson / Andrew Servita5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesManuel Rus / Thomas Kenny vs Nathan Lurz / Brett Leibsker6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTravis Marks / Jansen Gough vs Daniel Brosk / Michael Nothman6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesManuel Rus / James Kane vs Todd Schoenfeld / Christian Trujillo3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesTJ Billard vs Chase Glick6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoseph Vitacco / Travis Marks vs Marc Samson / Daniel Halperin1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAndrew Paik / Joseph Vitacco vs Nicholas Beckwith / Sam Niemiec3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTyler Hattery vs Nathan Lurz6-3, 6-0
L#1 DoublesTyler Hattery / Manuel Rus vs Jeffrey Aleman / Joseph Olstein2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesFilip Kempa vs Bernardo Hees6-4, 5-1
L#2 DoublesAaron Banduch / Thomas Kenny vs Evan Schaffer / Mathieu Holl4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMateo Velasco / Noah Roberts vs Dane Stevenson / Barry Gork6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesManuel Rus / Ciprian Robu vs Yutong Li / Dylan Wodrich4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTJ Billard / Thomas Kenny vs Raynard Laylo / Hilario Salgado2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesFilip Kempa vs Erik Astranskas5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Kane / Joseph Vitacco vs Andrew Servita / Ruben Mora1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OM3.0 3.RT Ciuca Sun 6 $2762261431284
2CDTA S 18&OM3.0 4.HF Salgado Sat 12 $2262251536297
3CDTA S 18&OM3.0 1.MTC Brown-1 Sat 3 $33.544221841312
4CDTA S 18&OM3.0 5.MTB(OUT) Reese Sun 6 $2935162453389
5CDTA S 18&OM3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sat 1 $33.517112962409

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Adrian Ciuca
published 4
3.13
Tyler Hattery
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.11
Filip Kempa
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.10
Atharv Koshti
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.99
Joseph Vitacco
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Jansen Gough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Manuel Rus
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Justin Larson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
David Johnsen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Ciprian Robu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Thomas Kenny
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Paik
published 3
2.75
TJ Billard
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Mateo Velasco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
James Kane
published
Travis Marks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Paik + Manuel Rus5066% games+10.0% vs expected
Tyler Hattery + Filip Kempa404 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Kenny + TJ Billard224 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Kenny + David Johnsen314 matchesnot enough data
Ciprian Robu + Manuel Rus224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adrian Ciuca
246W–154L career · no lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
4.06
Tyler Hattery
25W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Filip Kempa
25W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.11
3
Atharv Koshti
21W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Joseph Vitacco
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Jansen Gough
26W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Manuel Rus
44W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Justin Larson
22W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
David Johnsen
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Ciprian Robu
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Thomas Kenny
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.76
3
Andrew Paik
6W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
TJ Billard
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Mateo Velasco
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60
James Kane
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Travis Marks
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.