Teams

Black Clover/Kakumani/Fremont

2024 Tri-Level 3.5 · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-26vs ASRC/Mun/AlmadenWon 21
W#1 DoublesNeeraj Sharma / Anindya Banerjee vs Ashwin Seshadri Kalathur / Sang Gyum Kim6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMasashi Omori / Raghavendra Thodime vs Paul Shin / Andy Ewing6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRahul Madan / Sasideep Kakumani vs Paul Kwon / Peng Qu6-1, 7-6
W#1 DoublesNeeraj Sharma / Anindya Banerjee vs Michael Bedard / Kevin Lowe6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAaron Menezes / Ekow Taylor vs Cesar Hernandez / Jessie Logia6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHemanth K Popuri / Rahul Madan vs Fernando Ramos / Daniel Ocasio6-2, 7-5
2024-10-25vs Ruud Awakening/Pias/SunnyvaleWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Verdeflor / Imran Allana vs Elliot Beak / Donny Su4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAaron Menezes / Raghavendra Thodime vs David Le / Daniel Lloyd Pias1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHemanth K Popuri / Sasideep Kakumani vs Derrick Contreras / Kevin Liu6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Imran Allana
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.30
David Verdeflor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.02
Anindya Banerjee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Neeraj Sharma
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Masashi Omori
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Ekow Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Sasideep Kakumani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Rahul Madan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Raghavendra Thodime
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Aaron Menezes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.06
Ravindra Samson
published
Hemanth K Popuri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Verdeflor + Imran Allana3248% gamesnot enough data
Anindya Banerjee + Neeraj Sharma303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Imran Allana
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%80%20%
4.38
5
David Verdeflor
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
no projection at this level
4.30
4.5
Anindya Banerjee
22W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Neeraj Sharma
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.96
Masashi Omori
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.93
Ekow Taylor
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.86
Sasideep Kakumani
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Rahul Madan
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Raghavendra Thodime
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.60
4
Aaron Menezes
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.58
Ravindra Samson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Hemanth K Popuri
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.