Teams

GEPTA/Adult 3.5M/Estrada/EPTC#3

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-31Won 20
W#2 SinglesTrevor Hjalmquist vs Cesar Navar7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJuan Herrera / Francisco Otamendi vs Omar Lopez / Findlay Gabriel Yepo3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-05-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesTrevor Hjalmquist / Andres Intilia vs Roger Gonzalez / EDMUND OSEI-WUSU6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-05-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesTrevor Hjalmquist / Andres Intilia vs Marco Prince / Humberto Cardiel3-6, 2-3
W#2 DoublesFrancisco Otamendi / Juan Herrera vs Thomas Lore / Ed Savedra6-2, 7-5
2025-04-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVictor Parra / Javier Baeza vs Ivan Ortiz / Carlos Solis0-6, 1-6
2025-04-26vs GEPTA/Adult 3.5M/Garcia/EPTC#2Split 11
L#1 DoublesCharles Stephens / Javier Baeza vs Miguel Ramos Gonzalez / Mario Carrillo4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAndres Intilia / Trevor Hjalmquist vs Enrique Roldan / Cesar Ponce6-4, 6-2
2025-04-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndres Intilia / Trevor Hjalmquist vs Brandon Silverstein / Ray Bonds7-5, 6-3
2025-04-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndres Intilia / Trevor Hjalmquist vs Jorge Kareh / Octavio Corral6-1, 6-1
2025-03-28Split 11
L#2 DoublesNicholas Roacho / Trevor Hjalmquist vs David Lozano Luque / Ezri Navarro2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesFrancisco Otamendi / Juan Herrera vs Gerardo Martinez / Fernando Gonzalez7-5, 6-4
2025-03-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicholas Roacho / Trevor Hjalmquist vs Richard Overley / Greg Daw7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Melendez/Adult 18 & over/3.5M81311428319
2GEPTA/Adult3.5M/Becerra/EPTC#572291640380
3GEPTA/Adult 3.5M/Garcia/EPTC#263271840373
4GEPTA/Adult3.5M/Jones/EPTC#763281743376
5GEPTA/Adult 3.5M/Estrada/EPTC#354252048420
6GEPTA/Adult3.5M/Acevedo/CCC54202557443
7GEPTA/Adult3.5M/Harrison/EPCC36202558431
8GEPTA/Adult 3.5M/Tepsick/TW36172861446
9GEPTA/Adult 3.5M/Kim/FB18153066465
10GEPTA/Adult 3.5M/Lopez/EPTC#618133268467

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Andres Intilia
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.78
Charles Stephens
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
Francisco Otamendi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
James Lambeth
usually #2 Doubles 49%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Javier A Baeza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Javier Baeza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jose Hernandez-Bravo
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
Jose Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 31% · published
Juan Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Miguel Aguilera
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Nicholas Roacho
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Norm Estrada
usually #3 Doubles 68%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Steven King
published
Trevor Hjalmquist
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Victor Parra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
William Basquez
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Norm Estrada + Nicholas Roacho5352% gamesnot enough data
Norm Estrada + Juan Herrera4350% gamesnot enough data
Jose Moreno + Jose Hernandez-Bravo6166% gamesnot enough data
Norm Estrada + William Basquez2343% gamesnot enough data
James Lambeth + Javier Baeza1434% gamesnot enough data
Juan Herrera + Nicholas Roacho4157% gamesnot enough data
Trevor Hjalmquist + Andres Intilia5060% gamesnot enough data
Norm Estrada + James Lambeth134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andres Intilia
17W–20L career · 14 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Charles Stephens
37W–49L career · 17 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Francisco Otamendi
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
James Lambeth
106W–98L career · 45 lines in 2025
not enough data
Javier A Baeza
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Javier Baeza
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jose Hernandez-Bravo
30W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jose Moreno
38W–19L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Juan Herrera
42W–44L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Miguel Aguilera
15W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas Roacho
77W–58L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Norm Estrada
64W–83L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven King
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trevor Hjalmquist
21W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victor Parra
2W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Basquez
11W–17L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.