Teams

WI Adult 18&O 4.0M GML Lake Country WAC Crocker

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#2 DoublesDan Eggers / Jim Stefl vs Brant Christensen / Christopher Valentine4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesNicholas Aho / Brett Venzke vs Jack Lyons / Nicolas Sandoval5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKen Crocker vs Taylor Rusniak2-6, 1-6
2026-07-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNicholas Aho / Jim Stefl vs Justin Dorf / Jack Schultz5-7, 4-6
L#1 DoublesBrett Venzke / Nicholas Aho vs Rick Vetter / Vaughan Joubert3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKen Crocker vs Michael Korwin2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKeith Tubin vs Ashish Nigote2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTim Putzer / Tim Peterson vs Maurice Russell / Gerald Powers2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKen Crocker / Jim Stefl vs Michael Griggs / Juan Munoz7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brett Venzke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Keith Tubin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.53
Tim Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Nicholas Aho
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Dan Eggers
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Sean Pieri
published
3.36
Ken Crocker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.34
Jim Stefl
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Mark Randa
published
Tim Putzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Eggers + Jim Stefl22568% games+12.4% vs expected
Nicholas Aho + Tim Putzer5358% games+1.3% vs expected
Brett Venzke + Nicholas Aho11038% games−6.5% vs expected
Ken Crocker + Tim Putzer314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brett Venzke
1W–10L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Keith Tubin
2W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.58
Tim Peterson
2W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Nicholas Aho
17W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Dan Eggers
36W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.44
Sean Pieri
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
3.39
Ken Crocker
11W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Jim Stefl
43W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Mark Randa
0W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Putzer
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.