Teams

LATA18/Price/RC

2023 Adult 18 & Over - USTA · Adult Men - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-22vs LATA18/Gore/LCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesChandler Price / Barry Mathews vs Brad Seddon / Ben Secoy6-2, 6-4
2023-02-16vs LATA18-Henderson-LCTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesChandler Price / Barry Mathews vs Guy Wood / Colin Raynor1-6, 5-7
2023-02-08vs LATA18/Gore/LCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesChandler Price / Barry Mathews vs Zack Hawley / Adam Chittam6-2, 6-3
2023-02-01vs LATA18/Harrison/SSPWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarry Mathews / Chandler Price vs Duke Taylor / Pete Kleemoff6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Mark Rugg
published
3.52
Barry Mathews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.49
William Joachim
published
3.41
Brannon Hagins
published 3.5
3.34
Jeff Howle
published
3.26
Christopher Leigh
published 3.5
Jeffrey Anderson
published 3.5
3.25
Michael Turner
published 3.5
3.21
Chandler Price
published 3.5
3.17
Larry Ellisor
published
3.17
Michael Benton
published
2.79
Jonathan Nilsson
published
John Pierce
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barry Mathews + Michael Turner5167% gamesnot enough data
Larry Ellisor + Michael Turner1447% gamesnot enough data
Michael Benton + Larry Ellisor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Rugg
38W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Barry Mathews
212W–65L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
William Joachim
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Brannon Hagins
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
Jeff Howle
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Christopher Leigh
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Jeffrey Anderson
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Michael Turner
112W–108L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Chandler Price
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Larry Ellisor
30W–36L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Michael Benton
29W–17L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.17
Jonathan Nilsson
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.79
John Pierce
52W–44L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.