Teams

Pendleton-Tri-Level-Mixed

Social Tri-Level Mixed · Tri Level Mixed 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Tri Level Mixed 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Mark DePlanche
published
3.38
Rose Pendleton
published
3.35
Holly Sharp
published 3.5
Don Chon
published 3.5
3.25
Kaymarie Briddell
published
3.15
Alissa Marodis
published 3.5
3.06
Janet Carroll
published
3.00
Brannon Barragan
published 3
2.99
Rodrigo Barragan
published
Deborah Long
published 3
2.38
Drew Nelson
published 3
Paul Hayes
published
Stephen Chambers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brannon Barragan + Rodrigo Barragan1543% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark DePlanche
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.38
Rose Pendleton
29W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Holly Sharp
84W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Don Chon
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kaymarie Briddell
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alissa Marodis
17W–22L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
Janet Carroll
26W–44L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Brannon Barragan
17W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.00
Rodrigo Barragan
18W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Deborah Long
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Drew Nelson
10W–20L career · no lines in 2022
82%18%<1%
2.38
Paul Hayes
0W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Chambers
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.