Teams

Parrish/Nashville

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - Tuesday AM & PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-23vs Anderson/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Jones / Janet McMeen vs Jessica Osullivan / Megan McDugald7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusie Parrish / Jen Weber vs Courtney Hendry-Williams / Tracy Aszkler4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeigh Anne Hackett / Lisa Freund vs Melissa Bouman / Elizabeth Drew6-4, 7-5
2025-09-02vs Sengvilay/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJanet McMeen / Brenda Maddaleni vs Chiarra Jessey / Sara Lindsay3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Nixon / Tricia Thornton vs Kellyn Robison / Jennifer Gilkey6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJen Weber / Karie Duke vs Laura Beckert / Shaunielle Glen5-7, 4-6
2025-08-19vs Cox/Davis/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusie Parrish / Jennifer Jones vs Sarah Kunz / Nikki Turitto1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Nixon / Janet McMeen vs Eileen Smith / Elizabeth Coburn1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMacY Duke / Karie Duke vs Erin Neal / Jill Talbert4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-05vs Beattie/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrenda Maddaleni / Leigh Anne Hackett vs Jennifer Frank / Mary Stamelos6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusie Parrish / Tricia Thornton vs Christina Beattie / Ann Kehayes2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJanet McMeen / Karie Duke vs Katie Black / Ahra Kim2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - Tuesday AM & PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Brenda Maddaleni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Tricia Thornton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Lisa Freund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Lori Nixon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Karie Duke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Susie Parrish
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Leigh Anne Hackett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Janet McMeen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.72
GINA DEEB
published
MacY Duke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Freund + Karie Duke044 matchesnot enough data
Susie Parrish + GINA DEEB044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Freund + Lori Nixon123 matchesnot enough data
Susie Parrish + Leigh Anne Hackett033 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Thornton + Lori Nixon213 matchesnot enough data
Janet McMeen + Brenda Maddaleni033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brenda Maddaleni
18W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Tricia Thornton
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Lisa Freund
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Lori Nixon
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Karie Duke
1W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
Susie Parrish
1W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.85
Leigh Anne Hackett
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
Janet McMeen
17W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
GINA DEEB
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.72
MacY Duke
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.