Teams

GSCC BLUE

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-08vs CROWN REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesKipling Gomez vs Marlin Rhodes6-3, 6-4
2024-10-01vs CROWN BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesMax Lee / Bert Chilson vs Ryan Czarnecki / Brooks Shaffer4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAustin O'Connell / Matt Armentrout vs Robert Adams / Chase Ennis2-6, 1-6
2024-09-24vs GSCC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesBryan Snow / Ken Wanko vs Pearson Roberts / Shawn Lawrence7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-17vs CROWN REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBert Chilson / Max Lee vs Kent Oliver / Jim Dresser4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBryan Snow vs JR MUSSER4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKipling Gomez / Austin O'Connell vs Zach Stuart / Christian Clark6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-10vs CROWN BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKipling Gomez / Bert Chilson vs Francisco Elias / Robert Adams6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMatt Armentrout / Max Lee vs Paul Incze / Ryan Czarnecki0-6, 1-6
2024-08-27vs CROWN REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMax Lee / Bert Chilson vs JR MUSSER / Christian Clark2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAustin O'Connell vs Ted Davenport4-6, 0-6
2024-08-20vs CROWN BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesBert Chilson / Bryan Snow vs David Baugh / Francisco Elias3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBurke Eberly vs Wynne Philpott6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKipling Gomez / Max Lee vs Connor Wall / Paul Incze6-1, 6-2
2024-08-13vs GSCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesAustin O'Connell / Burke Eberly vs Pearson Roberts / Ryan Scheidt4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMatt Armentrout vs Shawn Lawrence1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Kipling Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Ken Wanko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Bert Chilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Bryan Snow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Austin O'Connell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Burke Eberly
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Matt Armentrout
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kipling Gomez
54W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.63
Ken Wanko
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Bert Chilson
13W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3
Bryan Snow
9W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.02
3
Austin O'Connell
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Burke Eberly
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Matt Armentrout
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.