Teams

CV-Parkerson

2024 CV Masters' 70s League · CV-Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-29vs CV-WillseySplit 11
W#2 DoublesWendy Hawley / Sally Mangina vs Patrice Dicasparro / Kerry MacPherson6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLindsay Price / Marsha Burke vs Pamela Hay / Barbara Johnson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-02-27vs CV-RingerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWendy Hawley / Sally Mangina vs Colleen Muhlbradt / Farzaneh Kia6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLindsay Price / Roberta Dierks vs Monica Sabo / Fay Zuccato3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-22vs CV-RingerWon 20
W#1 DoublesSally Mangina / Wendy Hawley vs Colleen Muhlbradt / Farzaneh Kia6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLindsay Price / Gina Orban vs Monica Sabo / MaryLynn Murphy6-2, 6-4
2024-02-15vs CV-GiacominiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSally Mangina / Wendy Hawley vs Marjo Hull / Ilse Hine6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJandi Fraser / Lindsay Price vs Eileen Clark / Jackie Brown2-6, 0-6
2024-02-13vs CV-RingerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Mangina / Jill Lawrence Polls vs Gay Hart / Martha Church2-6, 1-6
2024-01-25vs CV-GiacominiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSally Mangina / Wendy Hawley vs Eileen Clark / Ilse Hine6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEdna Swart / Lindsay Price vs Sharon Williams / Susan Vance3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-01-18vs CV-WillseySplit 11
L#1 DoublesSally Mangina / Jandi Fraser vs Carmen Almodovar / Patrice Dicasparro1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Weddle / Lindsay Price vs Loretta Gohd / Deborah Rogers6-3, 6-3
2024-01-04vs CV-GiacominiLost 01
L#1 DoublesSally Mangina / Wendy Hawley vs Susan Vance / Sharon Williams6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Sally Mangina
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.40
Jandi Fraser
published
3.01
Lindsay Price
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
JUDY MCLENNAN
published
2.86
Roberta Dierks
published
2.65
Susan Walker
published
Donna Shawhan
published
Edna Swart
published
Gina Orban
published
Jill Lawrence Polls
published
Michele Weddle
published
Wendy Hawley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sally Mangina
127W–117L career · 8 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Jandi Fraser
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Lindsay Price
41W–80L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
JUDY MCLENNAN
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
2.87
Roberta Dierks
14W–33L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
Susan Walker
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Donna Shawhan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Edna Swart
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gina Orban
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Lawrence Polls
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michele Weddle
7W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wendy Hawley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.