Teams

NITA F 75CMa Centre Court-Arora

2024 NITA4 Fall Combo · NITA Fall Combo 7.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-06vs NITA F 75CMc River Trails-ChoiLost 12
W#1 DoublesAvar Anand / Harsimran Singh vs Ben Hawke / Luke Breznau6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSupreet Arora / Harmeet Bagga vs Igor Gogov / YOSHITAKA KUMAGAI2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTejveer Soodan / Anmol Kapur vs Kedar Bhat / Justin Booms3-6, 0-6
2024-11-09vs NITA F 75CMc River Trails-ChoiWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnmol Kapur / Amanpreet Singh vs Ryan Sickle / YOSHITAKA KUMAGAI2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAMRITPAL ANAND / Avar Anand vs Ben Hawke / Luke Breznau6-4, 6-5
W#3 DoublesHarsimran Singh / Harmeek Singh vs Brian Benzer / Brian Atad6-4, 6-3
2024-11-03vs NIL 75CM CiucaLost 12
W#1 DoublesAvar Anand / Anmol Kapur vs Adrian Ciuca / Yaohua Liu7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPreet Singh / Tejveer Soodan vs Carlos Flores / Michael Hong0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPrempreet Bajaj / Harmeek Singh vs Thomas Tranter / Manuel Rus4-6, 1-6
2024-10-26vs NIL 75CM CiucaLost 12
W#1 DoublesAvar Anand / Harsimran Singh vs Simon Abraham / Michael Hong6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSupreet Arora / Amanpreet Singh vs Ionut Rus / Nicolae Cristian ROMAN3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesManmeet Singh / Harpreet Vohra vs Adrian Ciuca / Daniel Nica2-6, 1-6
2024-10-06vs NIL 75CM CiucaWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnmol Kapur / Avar Anand vs Simon Abraham / Mariusz Cislak7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPrempreet Bajaj / Supreet Arora vs Jean Michel Dos Remedios / Manuel Rus3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesHarsimran Singh / Harmeek Singh vs Daniel Nica / Constantin Tatulescu6-2, 6-3
2024-09-20vs NITA F 75CMc River Trails-ChoiLost 12
W#1 DoublesSupreet Arora / Avar Anand vs Igor Gogov / Brian Toba6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTejveer Soodan / Harsimran Singh vs Paul Leonardo / John Kim4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHarpreet Vohra / Manmeet Singh vs Young Choi / Travis Whitaker3-6, 3-6
2024-09-14vs NITA F 75CMc River Trails-ChoiLost 12
W#1 DoublesSupreet Arora / Avar Anand vs Henry Liu / Justin Booms6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPrempreet Bajaj / Anmol Kapur vs Igor Gogov / Howard Wu6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHarmeet Bagga / Amanpreet Singh vs Young Choi / Brian Toba0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NITA Fall Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Avar Anand
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.68
Supreet Arora
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.66
Anmol Kapur
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Amanpreet Singh
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Harmeet Bagga
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
AMRITPAL ANAND
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Harmeek Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Harpreet Vohra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Harsimran Singh
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Manmeet Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Preet Singh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Prempreet Bajaj
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tejveer Soodan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Supreet Arora + Anmol Kapur6650% games+9.3% vs expected
Supreet Arora + Prempreet Bajaj3249% gamesnot enough data
Avar Anand + Supreet Arora314 matchesnot enough data
Supreet Arora + Harmeet Bagga044 matchesnot enough data
Supreet Arora + Amanpreet Singh134 matchesnot enough data
Tejveer Soodan + Anmol Kapur134 matchesnot enough data
Harsimran Singh + AMRITPAL ANAND224 matchesnot enough data
Avar Anand + Anmol Kapur213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Avar Anand
17W–4L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Supreet Arora
56W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Anmol Kapur
26W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Amanpreet Singh
2W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Harmeet Bagga
6W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
AMRITPAL ANAND
4W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Harmeek Singh
2W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Harpreet Vohra
1W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Harsimran Singh
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Manmeet Singh
5W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Preet Singh
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Prempreet Bajaj
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tejveer Soodan
5W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.