Teams

DIAMOND HILLS CW6.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-18vs Walnut Creek TC CW6.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesStefanie Cohen / Yumiko Suzuki vs Jennifer Grant / Kelly Sanchez1-6, 2-6
2022-11-02vs ROUND HILL CC CW6.5BLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeraldine Alano / Stefanie Cohen vs Debbie Alster / Hui Xie1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-09vs Walnut Creek TC CW6.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesWinnie Rock / Stefanie Cohen vs Heather Houston / Shashanna Singh2-6, 4-6
2022-09-29vs ROUND HILL CC CW6.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesStefanie Cohen / Karen Bibel vs Yolla Elahmadie / Susie Hansen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-11vs RANCHO COLORADOS CW6.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesStefanie Cohen / Winnie Rock vs Mendy Gonzales / Amy Jones6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Corazon Bellamy
published 4
3.47
Olga Candelario
published
3.43
Tracie Cacciatore
published
3.39
Stefanie Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.33
Adrianna Lugo
published 3.5
3.20
Tina Lugo
published
3.17
Catherine Kutsuris
published 3.5
3.04
Priscilla Macksoud
published
2.99
Winnie Rock
published
2.95
Karen Bibel
published
2.91
Marie Austero
published
2.85
Luisa Wahlstrom
published
2.76
Girlie Sison
published 3
2.70
Andie Leandro
published 3
2.42
Karen Kerns
published
Lyne Anne Morales
published
Shirley Razdoroff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Lugo + Adrianna Lugo3746% games−2.1% vs expected
Marie Austero + Winnie Rock1639% games−6.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Corazon Bellamy
38W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
4.07
Olga Candelario
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
Tracie Cacciatore
67W–83L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
Stefanie Cohen
72W–42L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Adrianna Lugo
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Tina Lugo
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Catherine Kutsuris
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Priscilla Macksoud
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Winnie Rock
18W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
2.99
Karen Bibel
11W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
Marie Austero
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
Luisa Wahlstrom
59W–58L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Girlie Sison
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Andie Leandro
1W–16L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Karen Kerns
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.42
Lyne Anne Morales
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shirley Razdoroff
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.