Teams

MARIN TC 40AW4.5A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.5

22 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Jennifer Mills
published
4.25
Elizabeth Shalev
published 4.5
4.25
Jocelyn Werner
published
4.21
Loren Quaglieri
published 4.5
4.08
Sugi Bernard
published
4.07
Christine Mooney
published 4.5
4.04
Erin Feely
published 4.5
3.97
Merilee Bordin
published
3.88
Nicole Bianchi
published
3.87
Liz Hartmann
published
3.82
Lisa Eastlack
published
3.81
Lilian Kim
published
3.80
Nancy Martin
published
3.77
Karla Boisvert
published
3.75
Kris Hinckley
published
3.74
3.72
Elaine Kitano
published 4
3.70
Martina Hamamjian
published
3.61
Susan Swezy
published
3.61
Andrea Goldfien
published 4
3.53
Germana Fabbri
published 4
3.53
Tina Skouras
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sugi Bernard + Annie van Den Toorn6455% games+0.2% vs expected
Merilee Bordin + Martina Hamamjian5453% games−2.3% vs expected
Merilee Bordin + Kris Hinckley3263% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Mills
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Elizabeth Shalev
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
Jocelyn Werner
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Loren Quaglieri
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
4.21
Sugi Bernard
20W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
4.08
4.5
Christine Mooney
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Erin Feely
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
Merilee Bordin
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
Nicole Bianchi
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.88
Liz Hartmann
12W–15L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.87
Lisa Eastlack
38W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
Lilian Kim
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.81
Nancy Martin
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.80
Karla Boisvert
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Kris Hinckley
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Annie van Den Toorn
25W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Elaine Kitano
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Martina Hamamjian
12W–16L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Susan Swezy
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Andrea Goldfien
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Germana Fabbri
6W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
Tina Skouras
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.