Teams

Beerman Overserved - R. Coulton

2023 Polk Combo 18 & Over Spring · 6.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-16vs Winter Haven City 6.5 - G. TardyWon 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Nettles / Nathaly Arredondo vs Gloria Murphy / Leslie Simmons6-2, 6-0
2023-06-01vs Beerman - J. BordenWon 10
W#2 DoublesCynthia Nettles / Nathaly Arredondo vs Melanie Langley / Danielle Miller6-4, 7-5
2023-05-25vs Lakeland Country Club - L. ClarkLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Smith / Nathaly Arredondo vs Emily Johnson / Shannon Miles3-6, 3-6
2023-05-04vs Winter Haven City 6.5 - G. TardyLost 01
L#2 DoublesRose Coulton / Kara Reber vs Gloria Murphy / Tiffany Choe0-6, 2-6
2023-04-20vs Lakeland Country Club - L. ClarkWon 10
W#2 DoublesRose Coulton / Kara Reber vs Sandra Campisi / Jaimi Miller6-2, 6-0
2023-04-13vs CC of Winter Haven - L. MasonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKara Reber / Nathaly Arredondo vs Kacee Swain / Brittany Ward7-6, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Angie Shoemaker
published 3.5
3.15
Allison Sorenson
published 3.5
3.13
Lisa Whitsell
published
3.12
Nathaly Arredondo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Cynthia Nettles
published 3.5
3.02
Desiree Tchipanova
published 3.5
2.86
Rose Coulton
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.80
Jihyeon Choe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Sorenson + Rose Coulton20459% games−0.6% vs expected
Allison Sorenson + Nathaly Arredondo314 matchesnot enough data
Allison Sorenson + Desiree Tchipanova033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angie Shoemaker
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Allison Sorenson
96W–39L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
Lisa Whitsell
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Nathaly Arredondo
78W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cynthia Nettles
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Desiree Tchipanova
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Rose Coulton
110W–109L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
Jihyeon Choe
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.