Teams

LJTH-Theisen/NMP

2024 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Men 3.0 Sunday

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-19vs LJSchoenrock/WestportLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeff Reiner / David Peeler vs John Murphy / Greg Gardner2-6, 2-6
2024-05-16vs LTPO-Powell/Westport_40+Spring3.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJon Theisen / Steven Ashenfarb vs Paul Childers / Timothy Powell2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTim Cunnane / Kevin Loomis vs Scott Edgar / Edwin Stinson0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-28vs LAFE-Feinberg/Jetton 40+ 3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Reiner / David Peeler vs Todd Wilkins / Marc Dy2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Romley / Kevin Loomis vs Harrell Solomon / Russell Swift6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-21vs LSMA-Martin/LNRCWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Romley / Kevin Loomis vs Charlie Kosior / Jim Staley6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJon Theisen / Curtis Bishop vs Mark Hamm / Scott Boyles6-4, 6-4
2024-04-14vs LJDO-Donahue/RRCCWon 31
L#1 DoublesJon Theisen / Neil McLean vs Thomas Noyes / Carson Anderson1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesFrank Silva / Jeff Reiner vs Bruce Seeber / Dave Wansley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Romley / Kevin Loomis vs Bill Worsley / Blake Brescian5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#4 DoublesKeith MacVean / David Peeler vs Jonathan Donahue / Ken Bush7-5, 6-0
2024-04-07vs LJSchoenrock/WestportSplit 11
L#3 DoublesKeith MacVean / Curtis Bishop vs Jason Schoenrock / Tommy Dixon2-6, 3-6
W#4 DoublesDavid Peeler / Jeff Reiner vs Chris Wendt / Michael Palmer0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-24vs LTPO-Powell/Westport_40+Spring3.0Split 11
L#2 DoublesKeith MacVean / Jeff Reiner vs Tom Mullen / James Laurenson4-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesKevin Loomis / Steve Riddle vs Scott Edgar / Bill Simpson7-5, 6-2
2024-03-17vs LAFE-Feinberg/Jetton 40+ 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Reiner / Jon Theisen vs Marc Dy / Al Solis4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Ashenfarb / Kevin Loomis vs William Cune / Russell Swift6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesDavid Peeler / Curtis Bishop vs Walter Rodriguez / Charles Spiggle4-6, 1-6
2024-03-10vs LSMA-Martin/LNRCWon 31
W#1 DoublesJon Theisen / Neil McLean vs Ryan Neufeld / Scott Boyles6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDavid Peeler vs Stan Martin0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTim Cunnane / Kevin Loomis vs Jim Staley / Charlie Kosior6-3, 6-2
W#4 DoublesJeff Reiner / Keith MacVean vs David James / Drew Porcello6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-03vs LJDO-Donahue/RRCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesJeff Reiner vs Dave Wansley0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Peeler / Kevin Loomis vs Todd Simmel / Mark McGuire6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesJon Theisen / Curtis Bishop vs Jonathan Donahue / Bill Worsley4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Kevin Loomis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.11
Andrew Howland
published 3.5
3.08
Jeff Reiner
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
David Romley
published 3
2.87
Jon Theisen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.84
Neil McLean
published
2.69
David Peeler
usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.61
Bill Shehane
published 3
2.58
Keith MacVean
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Reiner + Kevin Loomis4257% gamesnot enough data
David Peeler + Jeff Reiner134 matchesnot enough data
Keith MacVean + Jeff Reiner123 matchesnot enough data
David Peeler + Jon Theisen123 matchesnot enough data
David Peeler + Kevin Loomis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kevin Loomis
74W–28L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Andrew Howland
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Jeff Reiner
79W–54L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
David Romley
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Jon Theisen
41W–64L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
Neil McLean
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
David Peeler
44W–60L career · 7 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Bill Shehane
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Keith MacVean
34W–89L career · 4 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.