Teams

CDTA S 18&OM3.5 1.HF Servita Sat 2 $22

1Summer 18&O WN · WE

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 SinglesPiotr Lojko vs Matt Jaffe6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Servita vs Mason Shinn6-3, 6-2
2026-06-28Won 20
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Servita vs Sathish Ponneboina6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesPiotr Lojko vs Abhi Pugazhendi6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesPiotr Lojko / Rob Castanares vs Jacob Newkirk / Zhanyuan Zhang6-3, 5-3
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Servita vs Haris Domond6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Servita vs Ethan Purrington6-3, 4-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlvin Bulaon / Hilario Salgado vs Ron Netzel / Patrick Walsh6-3, 6-4
L#1 DoublesMaciej Brzyski / Piotr Lojko vs DOMINIC KIRSCHBAUM / Murugan Poornachandr0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJeffrey Servita vs Dae Lee6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesAtwood Burns / Jeffrey Servita vs Roland Liccioni / Matthew Shearer7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMaciej Brzyski / Piotr Lojko vs Steve Towne / Steve Pautler6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OM3.5 6.RT Ciuca Wed 7 $276024620200
2CDTA S 18&OM3.5 1.HF Servita Sat 2 $225122819212
3CDTA S 18&OM3.5 11.STP Zhou Sun 3 $224118719155
4CDTA S 18&OM3.5 7.Wilm Anderson Sat 11 $2242191126218
5CDTA S 18&OM3.5 4.MTP Korczak Sun 1 $2742171328238
6CDTA S 18&OM3.5 8.Tam Bhat Sat 3 $2233131735253
7CDTA S 18&OM3.5 3.MTC Brown Sun 12 $33.533151536293
8CDTA S 18&OM3.5 2.Life Collins Sun 1 $2724111940275
9CDTA S 18&OM3.5 9.XS(OUT) Domond Sun 2 $271471840260
10CDTA S 18&OM3.5 5.Wilm Lado Sat 1 $200692147330
11CDTA S 18&OM3.5 10.WSC Mills Sat 4 $200652551320

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Jeffrey Servita
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.41
Branden Schmitt
published 3.5
3.36
Piotr Lojko
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.26
Alvin Bulaon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Rob Castanares
published 3.5
3.17
Atwood Burns
published 3.5
3.13
Raynard Laylo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.95
Erik Astranskas
published 3
2.94
Hilario Salgado
published 3
2.90
Luciano Tovar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.87
Patrick Gayatin
published 3
2.68
Chase Glick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Michael House
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luciano Tovar + Hilario Salgado10463% games+12.1% vs expected
Raynard Laylo + Patrick Gayatin301553% games+1.9% vs expected
Patrick Gayatin + Jeffrey Servita3643% games−4.3% vs expected
Raynard Laylo + Erik Astranskas6066% gamesnot enough data
Raynard Laylo + Hilario Salgado6078% gamesnot enough data
Atwood Burns + Patrick Gayatin134 matchesnot enough data
Atwood Burns + Jeffrey Servita404 matchesnot enough data
Alvin Bulaon + Hilario Salgado224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Servita
37W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Branden Schmitt
6W–3L career · type D · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Piotr Lojko
24W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
3.5
Alvin Bulaon
21W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Rob Castanares
73W–54L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Atwood Burns
89W–85L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.17
Raynard Laylo
65W–113L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Erik Astranskas
18W–26L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Hilario Salgado
44W–53L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%32%
2.94
Luciano Tovar
27W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Patrick Gayatin
44W–57L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Chase Glick
6W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Michael House
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.