Teams

Rally Cats 3.0

2024 Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekend · Shenandoah Singles 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-16vs All About That AceLost 01
L#2 SinglesSarah Midgley vs TOBI PARK0-6, 4-6
2024-03-10Lost 01
L#2 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Julie Stefanik2-6, 4-6
2024-02-24vs Net ChixWon 10
W#3 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Heather Saville3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-18vs All About that Ace BWon 10
W#1 SinglesSarah Midgley vs Janet Bailey2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-11vs All About That AceSplit 11
L#2 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Jolene Lopez1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesSarah Midgley vs Ann Carter6-1, 6-1
2024-02-03vs All About That AceSplit 11
W#1 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Elisa Joyner6-4, 6-5
L#2 SinglesSarah Midgley vs TOBI PARK1-6, 5-6
2024-01-21vs Net ChixSplit 11
L#2 SinglesIngrid Hunsicker vs Julie Stefanik2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesSarah Midgley vs Carrie Keyes6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Kristin Gibbs
published
2.84
Ingrid Hunsicker
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.82
Deborah Williams
published 3
2.60
Sarah Midgley
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.59
Linda Dinga
published
2.28
Christina White
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Midgley + Ingrid Hunsicker033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Gibbs
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3
Ingrid Hunsicker
111W–174L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Deborah Williams
28W–35L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Sarah Midgley
33W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%75%<1%
2.60
Linda Dinga
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
2.5
Christina White
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.