Teams

SFV-Get Smashed/Dan Lula

2025 Mixed 55 SFV Fall · SFV 55 & Over - 7.0 MxD

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SFV 55 & Over - 7.0 MxD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Kenny Koh
published
3.72
Teri Gustafson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Jo Ann Thrailkill
published
3.40
David Lubnow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Margie Englis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
David Jeffries
published 3.5
3.24
Samuel Domingo
published
3.21
Dan Lula
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Mark Gasper
published
3.16
Andrew Wheeler
published 3.5
3.14
Diana Massaria
published 3.5
3.10
Keiko Kato Verrier
published
3.07
Gabrielle Shrier
published 3.5
3.06
Simon Khilkevich
published
3.05
Cindy LuLu Young
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Cindy Larson
published 3
2.84
Stella Dumlao-Idea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy LuLu Young + Dan Lula224 matchesnot enough data
Keiko Kato Verrier + Dan Lula213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenny Koh
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Teri Gustafson
84W–67L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Jo Ann Thrailkill
34W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
4
David Lubnow
73W–69L career · 3 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
David Jeffries
8W–27L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.25
Samuel Domingo
21W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.24
3.5
Dan Lula
138W–81L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Mark Gasper
4W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.19
3.5
Andrew Wheeler
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Diana Massaria
20W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Keiko Kato Verrier
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Gabrielle Shrier
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Simon Khilkevich
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Cindy LuLu Young
91W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Cindy Larson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Stella Dumlao-Idea
180W–184L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.