Teams

LA - Baby Got Backhand

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over – LA · LA - Women 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesMichelle Horvitz / Bahareh Saedi vs Neha Desai / Cindy Emanuel7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElke Dobrowoslki vs Amanda Lie3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRona Steinberg / LYNDA WEITZMAN vs Liz Piotrowski / Rachael Alberti2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-13vs LA - MulhollandSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusanna Lovell / Michelle Sarraf vs Lauren Morphew / Sara Gershfeld6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEunjeong Kim vs Susan Carter Hall1-6, 6-7
2025-04-13vs LA - Balls DeepWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Ruben / Michelle Horvitz vs Joelle Boucai / Melissa Karz6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElke Dobrowoslki vs Jenna Gambaro7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Tressa M Dhiab
published
2.84
Susanna Lovell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Bahareh Saedi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Eunjeong Kim
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.57
Michelle Horvitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Michelle Sarraf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Lisa Ruben
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Elke Dobrowoslki
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.35
Rona Steinberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
Sharon Eshaghoff
published
Jessica Samuel
published
LYNDA WEITZMAN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Ruben + Michelle Horvitz134 matchesnot enough data
LYNDA WEITZMAN + Rona Steinberg033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tressa M Dhiab
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Susanna Lovell
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Bahareh Saedi
0W–2L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Eunjeong Kim
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Horvitz
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.57
Michelle Sarraf
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Lisa Ruben
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.40
2.5
Elke Dobrowoslki
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Rona Steinberg
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35
Sharon Eshaghoff
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Jessica Samuel
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
LYNDA WEITZMAN
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.