Teams

6 ACAC Davis 6.5

2022 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-08-21vs 8 RCC KochWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristina Aeinan Kang / Alicia Zatcoff vs Beverly Davis / Zinie Sampson6-2, 6-1
2022-08-14vs 1 Woodlake GirouxWon 10
W#1 DoublesRebecca Cassilly / Christina Aeinan Kang vs Laurie Cooksey / Laura Brawley6-1, 6-1
2022-08-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesIrene Quilez / Christina Aeinan Kang vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Christina Aeinan Kang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.41
Robin Griffith
published
3.23
Rebecca Cassilly
published
3.21
Jean Davis
published
3.16
Dawn Kelsey
published 3.5
3.15
Irene Quilez
published 3.5
3.11
Erika King
published 3.5
3.00
Joanne Wilson
published
2.77
Pamela Blackburn
published
2.76
LOUISA HARRISON
published
2.75
Jane Parrish
published
Katy Bassler
published
Lisa Aaron
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Aeinan Kang
157W–167L career · 8 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Robin Griffith
31W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Rebecca Cassilly
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jean Davis
24W–23L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dawn Kelsey
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Irene Quilez
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Erika King
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
Joanne Wilson
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
Pamela Blackburn
28W–34L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
LOUISA HARRISON
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Jane Parrish
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.75
Katy Bassler
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Aaron
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.