Teams

SDNC 7.0 San Dieguito TC/ Reilly

2023 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC - 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-26vs SDNC 7.0 RBS&TC/ SmotrichLost 01
L#3 DoublesDebby Latterich / Kendal McNaught-Davis Hess vs Yekaterina Smotrich / Satheesh Kandavelu1-6, 4-6
2023-03-04vs SDNC LLW 7.0 Morgan Run/ FiliciaLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebra Reilly / Gregory Einhorn vs Elizabeth Li / Robert Lozano1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDebby Latterich / Kendal McNaught-Davis Hess vs Danna Dickson / Michael Vaughan5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2023-02-18vs SDNC 7.0 Winners TC/ ZemanLost 01
L#3 DoublesDebby Latterich / Kendal McNaught-Davis Hess vs Roger Zeman / Haixin Li5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-02-04vs SDNC 7.0 RSFTC/ LindseyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKendal McNaught-Davis Hess / Eva Froyd vs Christine Tangarie / Daniel Morilak4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-21vs SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ BrickLost 01
L#1 DoublesPamela Sanford / Kendal McNaught-Davis Hess vs Michelle Atkinson / Bruce Danielson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-07vs SDNC 7.0 RPTC/ WilsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesGregory Einhorn / Debra Reilly vs Alex Hutcheson / Chau Hutcheson3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Eva Froyd
published 4
3.69
Dung Ngo
published 4
3.65
Debra Reilly
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.28
Brian Walsh
published 3.5
3.14
Kendal McNaught-Davis Hess
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Phil Ryan
published
3.11
Debby Latterich
published 3.5
2.90
Sheryl Nelson
published
Michael Nasim
published
Randall Mar
published
Rebecca Walsh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Walsh + Brian Walsh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eva Froyd
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Dung Ngo
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Debra Reilly
121W–145L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Brian Walsh
3W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Kendal McNaught-Davis Hess
59W–148L career · 9 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Phil Ryan
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Debby Latterich
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Sheryl Nelson
0W–16L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
Michael Nasim
1W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Randall Mar
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Walsh
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.