Teams

BUF: Street Ballers

2025 55&Over Women · 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-20vs AbelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarol Salvatore / Rowena de Perio vs Audrey Cohn / Molly Connerton6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth White / Linda Capenhurst vs Colleen Darby / Dee Dee Fisher6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Hughes / Jan Coleman vs Laurie Krajna / Cheryl Athoe2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-19vs AbelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesRowena de Perio / Nancy Rehak vs Molly Connerton / Sally Abell6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLinda Capenhurst / Carol Salvatore vs Jane Early / Helen Marlette6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJean Jurek / Karen Hughes vs Laurie Krajna / Cheryl Athoe4-6, 3-6
2025-08-13vs AbelsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJean Jurek / Elizabeth White vs Molly Connerton / Mary-Ann Jolley5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Hughes / Claudia Smolinski vs Kathleen Banks / Katalin Mechtler6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJan Coleman / Linda Capenhurst vs Dee Dee Fisher / Laurie Krajna6-4, 6-3
2025-08-11vs AbelsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichele McGrath / Teresa Arena vs Mary-Ann Jolley / Jane Early6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNancy Rehak / Linda Capenhurst vs Molly Connerton / Sally Abell2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesClaudia Smolinski / June Brennan vs Colleen Darby / Connie Littlewood6-3, 6-0
2025-08-07vs AbelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichele McGrath / Teresa Arena vs Audrey Cohn / Mary-Ann Jolley6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth White / Silva Banboukian Serghany vs Kathleen Banks / Jane Early7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJune Brennan / Jan Coleman vs Katalin Mechtler / Helen Marlette6-2, 6-4
2025-08-04vs AbelsWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth White / Silva Banboukian Serghany vs Sally Abell / Katalin Mechtler6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarol Salvatore / Rowena de Perio vs Kathleen Banks / Jane Early6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Hughes / Nancy Rehak vs Helen Marlette / Colleen Darby6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Michele McGrath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Claudia Smolinski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Nancy Rehak
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Carol Salvatore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Jan Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Rowena de Perio
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Teresa Arena
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Jean Jurek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Elizabeth White
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.43
June Brennan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Karen Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Capenhurst
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Silva Banboukian Serghany
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Salvatore + Michele McGrath5262% games+9.1% vs expected
Nancy Rehak + Michele McGrath19460% games+5.4% vs expected
Carol Salvatore + Rowena de Perio9555% games+4.3% vs expected
Silva Banboukian Serghany + Rowena de Perio9459% games+3.7% vs expected
Rowena de Perio + Michele McGrath12758% games+2.5% vs expected
Jan Coleman + Michele McGrath201056% games+1.9% vs expected
Carol Salvatore + Nancy Rehak3351% games+0.8% vs expected
Teresa Arena + Michele McGrath331955% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michele McGrath
107W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Claudia Smolinski
47W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Nancy Rehak
101W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Carol Salvatore
83W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Jan Coleman
65W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Rowena de Perio
90W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Teresa Arena
60W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jean Jurek
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Elizabeth White
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
June Brennan
25W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Karen Hughes
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Capenhurst
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Silva Banboukian Serghany
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.