Teams

Boggs

2026 Lubbock Adult League 18 & Over · 3.0 Ladies

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-18vs McGuireWon 40
W#1 DoublesLeslie Morgan / Cody Boggs vs Dawn Powell / Jessica Zalman6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHampton Hays / Sarah McKoin vs Kaycee Tabor / Keeli Hobratschk7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLingxi Xu vs Kondi Littlefield6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Cartwright / Teresa Popp vs Jeri McGuire / Toni Rentfro6-3, 1-0
2026-05-13vs MejaWon 31
L#1 DoublesLeslie Morgan / Natasha Newman vs Katie Kamper / Emily Jenkins3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Eubanks / Jayme Pearson vs Sara Parrott / Anna Purdue7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCody Boggs vs Chamonix Mejia6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHampton Hays / Samantha Chitsey vs Paige Homen / Katie Crump6-1, 6-1
2026-05-04vs PerrinSplit 22
W#1 DoublesValerie Wynn / Jami Broussard vs Mariana Hatch / Emily Liner6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLingxi Xu vs Ann-Marie Saleh6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Eubanks / Jayme Pearson vs Laura Seybert / Kaci Griffin6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Cartwright / Teresa Popp vs Sydney Farris / Mary Claire Hohenberger4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-04-27vs Copeland/NixonLost 14
W#1 DoublesLeslie Morgan / Cody Boggs vs Noelle Flores / Dawn Cox6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLingxi Xu vs Kathy Sim4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesNatasha Newman / Kate Miller vs Ashley Copeland / Allison Childress3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesHampton Hays vs Eila MacHado1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Eubanks / Jami Broussard vs Jordan DeBolt / Holly Carter2-6, 1-6
2026-04-20vs MejaWon 32
L#1 DoublesJami Broussard / Natasha Newman vs Katie Kamper / Emily Jenkins2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLingxi Xu vs Jacky Nghiem6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeslie Morgan / Cody Boggs vs Jill Simpson / Ashlen Sturdivant6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesSamantha Chitsey vs Chamonix Mejia3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHampton Hays / Kathy Eubanks vs Anna Purdue / Paige Homen6-2, 6-1
2026-04-14vs McGuireWon 40
W#1 DoublesLinda Cartwright / Teresa Popp vs Dawn Powell / Jessica Zalman6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah McKoin / Valerie Wynn vs Julie Williams / Kate Williams6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLingxi Xu vs Toni Rentfro6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSamantha Chitsey / Hampton Hays vs Jennifer Ogle / Jorja Mcguire6-2, 6-4
2026-04-09vs Copeland/NixonLost 23
L#1 DoublesJami Broussard / Natasha Newman vs Allison Childress / Jordan DeBolt1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLingxi Xu vs Ashley Copeland6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCody Boggs / Leslie Morgan vs Holly Carter / Dawn Cox3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesValerie Wynn vs Kathy Sim1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJayme Pearson / Kathy Eubanks vs Noelle Flores / Robin Nixon4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-23vs PerrinSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNatasha Newman / Jami Broussard vs Jessica Marie Smith / Ann-Marie Saleh6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLingxi Xu vs Dayna McCutchin6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJayme Pearson / Sarah McKoin vs Ginger McDowell / Mariana Hatch2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTeresa Popp / Linda Cartwright vs Laura Seybert / Sydney Farris6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Sarah McKoin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Natasha Newman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Valerie Wynn
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Cody Boggs
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3
2.92
Samantha Chitsey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.90
Linda Cartwright
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Teresa Popp
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Lingxi Xu
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.86
Hampton Hays
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.84
Jami Broussard
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Kathy Eubanks
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.63
Jayme Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jayme Pearson + Kathy Eubanks6262% games+19.1% vs expected
Linda Cartwright + Teresa Popp4550% games−0.7% vs expected
Samantha Chitsey + Hampton Hays5161% gamesnot enough data
Natasha Newman + Jami Broussard134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah McKoin
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.14
Natasha Newman
16W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Valerie Wynn
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Cody Boggs
39W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Samantha Chitsey
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
Linda Cartwright
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Teresa Popp
6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Lingxi Xu
5W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Hampton Hays
12W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
Jami Broussard
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
Kathy Eubanks
17W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Jayme Pearson
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.