Teams

Tonks/Pebble Creek/Fhills

2024 Foothills Tri-Level - 18 & over · Women's Group B 3.0-3.5-4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-29vs Miller/DV/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathy Collins / Staci Shafer vs Lisa Cooper / Carrie Henderson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2024-07-23vs LHCC/Horyza/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathy Collins / Staci Shafer vs Jennifer Graham / Ashley Stahlschmidt7-6, 6-3
2024-07-15vs Sanders/CRCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathy Collins / Staci Shafer vs Chapel Davis / Joy Romano6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-08vs Moore/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesParis Sellers / Staci Shafer vs Emily Fisher / Jennifer Mcmillan4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-25vs LHCC/Red/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Meier / Staci Shafer vs Tisha Zagaroli / Jennifer Parker6-3, 6-2
2024-06-18vs LHCC/Blue/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathy Collins / Staci Shafer vs Donna Atwood / Cheryl Howitt6-1, 6-2
2024-06-10vs Shokes/Fuller/CCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesStaci Shafer / Elena Willging vs Sondra Simmons / Taylor Austin3-6, 3-6
2024-06-04vs Shokes/Fuller/CCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesStaci Shafer / Kathy Collins vs Shannon Fuller / Karen Shokes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group B 3.0-3.5-4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Karen Tonks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Ellen Stupka
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
3.68
Saundra Denny
published
3.67
Jeanne Ann Lewis
published
3.63
Candace Scott
published 4
3.51
Tracy Kiefer
published
3.42
Dawn Owens
published 4
3.12
Cori Peters
published 3.5
3.08
Cori Thompson
published 3.5
2.98
Kathy Collins
published
2.91
Staci Shafer
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Staci Shafer + Kathy Collins8162% games+15.6% vs expected
Karen Tonks + Ana Cristina Ivach3256% games+1.3% vs expected
Ellen Stupka + Karen Tonks4452% games−5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Karen Tonks
123W–132L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ellen Stupka
72W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Ana Cristina Ivach
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Saundra Denny
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Jeanne Ann Lewis
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Candace Scott
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
Tracy Kiefer
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Dawn Owens
3W–18L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Cori Peters
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cori Thompson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.08
Kathy Collins
31W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Staci Shafer
196W–223L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.