Teams

BC-MCC/JhoannaTorres

2023 Adult 18 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

24 players · average NTRP 4.14 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-25vs BC-MCC/RachelAlexanderWon 20
W#2 DoublesKris Rone / Heidi Weber vs Kimberly Graham / Elizabeth Alexander6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJill Halkias / Frances Hong vs Kristina Mohr / Linda Lai2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-04vs BC-ErnieHowlett/TracyCostantinoWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Ashcraft / Kelly Robson vs Margaret Gray / Tami Reyes6-4, 6-4
2023-05-07vs BC-PVTC/GalenaMiller-HoriiSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLauren Bruksch / Sejal Penkar vs Karen Kredel / Stephanie Guggenheim4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesFrances Hong / Heidi Weber vs Victoria Mary Bernard / Abigail Puccinelli6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2023-04-30vs BC-ElDorado/JoGarrettWon 20
W#1 DoublesSejal Penkar / Lindsay Ashcraft vs Laurette Jennings / Britta Hurst6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKris Rone / Denise Towsley vs Liz Kirksey / Char Geary6-4, 6-4
2023-04-23vs BC-Kramer/SophieSokolowSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSejal Penkar vs Michelle Tangeman7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesFrances Hong / Becky Anzivino vs Susan Dalton / Leslie Royles4-6, 6-7
2023-04-16vs SoCal/Odanaka/18&Over4.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsay Ashcraft / Lauren Estabrook vs Evelyn Yanke / Kayla Yanke4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Sejal Penkar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.26
Lauren Estabrook
published
4.18
Lindsay Ashcraft
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Kelly Robson
published
3.89
Kristina Schrader
published
3.79
Heidi Nelson
published 4
3.78
Denise Towsley
published 4
3.77
Carrie Arsenault
published 4
3.75
Leasa Ireland
published
Becky Anzivino
published 4
Heidi Weber
published 4
3.73
Serene Peterson
published
3.71
Kelli Spriggs
published
3.69
Kristen Finn
published
3.69
Lauren Bruksch
published
3.68
Jhoanna Torres
published
3.65
Kris Rone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Frances Hong
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Bernice Lake
published 4
3.58
Aparna Voleti
published 4
3.38
Julie Watts
published
3.35
Jill Halkias
published
JoAnn Totzke
published
Lisa Schlager
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Ashcraft + Sejal Penkar8256% gamesnot enough data
Kris Rone + Lauren Bruksch044 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Ashcraft + Kelly Robson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Sejal Penkar
50W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
4.52
Lauren Estabrook
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Lindsay Ashcraft
74W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
4.18
Kelly Robson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
4.18
Kristina Schrader
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Heidi Nelson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Denise Towsley
8W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Carrie Arsenault
65W–33L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Leasa Ireland
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Becky Anzivino
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Heidi Weber
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Serene Peterson
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Kelli Spriggs
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Kristen Finn
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Lauren Bruksch
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Jhoanna Torres
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Kris Rone
71W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Frances Hong
74W–93L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Bernice Lake
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Aparna Voleti
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Julie Watts
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.38
Jill Halkias
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.35
JoAnn Totzke
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Schlager
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.