Teams

Wilkins/FS/BG

2026 Adult 40 & Over Spring 3 League · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-07vs Gates/FS/BGWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Porter / Tobi Wilkins vs Jan Gates / Glenna Gilliam6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Kremers / Angelica Hernandez vs Ann Truitt / Jennifer Hurst6-0, 6-3
L#4 DoublesCynthia Bushnaq / Emily Knoll vs Pamela Thames / Melissa Schoenfeld0-6, 0-6
2026-05-04vs Gates/FS/BGWon 31
W#1 DoublesJessica Riggins / Angelica Hernandez vs Jan Gates / Brooke Runser6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Porter / Teresa Williams vs Elaine Howell / Jennifer Smith6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNancy Kremers / Tobi Wilkins vs Ann Truitt / Lynda McCain6-1, 7-5
L#4 DoublesEmily Knoll / Michelle Greenfield vs Melissa Schoenfeld / Stephanie Selman3-6, 2-6
2026-04-21vs Harp/Alma/CMSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTeresa Williams / Angelica Hernandez vs Amy Roffine / Shannon Shell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Kremers / Tobi Wilkins vs Kelly Wingfield / Jacie Hamby1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCynthia Bushnaq / Michelle Greenfield vs Jenny Wilkerson / Sharon Guzman5-7, 3-6
W#4 DoublesKimberly Porter / Jessica Riggins vs Cristy Harp / Stephanie Neidecker3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-31vs Harp/Alma/CMLost 13
W#1 DoublesJessica Riggins / Teresa Williams vs Stephanie Neidecker / Jenny Wilkerson6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Kremers / Tobi Wilkins vs Kelly Wingfield / Wendy Mullens3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStacy Seeger / Michelle Greenfield vs Carrie Medlyn / Becke Symonds5-7, 3-6
L#4 DoublesKathy Remerscheid / Emily Knoll vs Cristy Harp / Sharon Guzman1-6, 2-6
2026-03-12vs Gates/FS/BGWon 31
W#1 DoublesJessica Riggins / Kimberly Porter vs Glenna Gilliam / Brooke Runser6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSavannah Lopez / Stacy Seeger vs Jan Gates / Jennifer Smith5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Kremers / Tobi Wilkins vs Ann Truitt / Lynda McCain6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesAngelica Hernandez / Michelle Greenfield vs Elaine Howell / Jennifer Hurst4-6, 2-6
2026-03-10vs Harp/Alma/CMLost 13
L#1 DoublesJessica Riggins / Stacy Seeger vs Laura Pearce / Shannon Shell6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Williams / Angelica Hernandez vs Amy Roffine / Lori Forsgren6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Kremers / Tobi Wilkins vs Kelly Wingfield / Jacie Hamby2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesEmily Knoll / Michelle Greenfield vs Wendy Mullens / Becke Symonds1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Harp/Alma/CM6017717184
2Wilkins/FS/BG24121230221
3Gates/FS/BG1571736238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Kimberly Porter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Teresa Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Nancy Kremers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Jessica Riggins
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
2.37
Angelica Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.27
Tobi Wilkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.20
Stacy Seeger
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.97
Cynthia Bushnaq
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.84
Michelle Greenfield
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
1.71
Emily Knoll
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Kathy Remerscheid
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Savannah Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Kremers + Tobi Wilkins2341% games−9.0% vs expected
Angelica Hernandez + Teresa Williams213 matchesnot enough data
Emily Knoll + Michelle Greenfield033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Porter
6W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
Teresa Williams
15W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
Nancy Kremers
25W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
Jessica Riggins
13W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
2.5
Angelica Hernandez
11W–14L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37
Tobi Wilkins
14W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.27
Stacy Seeger
11W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Cynthia Bushnaq
3W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Michelle Greenfield
5W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
2.5
Emily Knoll
4W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.71
Kathy Remerscheid
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Savannah Lopez
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.