Teams

Webster - Mixed 40s 8.0

2022 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-05vs Brown K - Mixed 40s 8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / George Clutts vs Peter Novosad / Kathy Pace2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Bolton / Evelyn Strader vs Pam McAmis / Brad McAmis4-6, 3-6
2022-07-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesGeorge Clutts / Libby Strickland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesRobin Andree / Evelyn Strader vs Leah Price / John Shane6-0, 6-2
2022-07-11vs Dagger - Mixed 40s 8.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesCharles Bolton / Libby Strickland vs Anne Crutchfield / Richard Crutchfield6-3, 6-2
2022-06-20vs Robb - Mixed 40s 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Peter Glud vs Lauren Nutt / Brian Smith5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-06vs Smith - Mixed 40's 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLibby Strickland / Peter Glud vs Caroline McAlister / Eric Nocera2-6, 1-6
2022-05-30vs DEAN - Mixed 40s 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Webster / Evelyn Strader vs Tony McGraw / Carrie Ganim2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Lynn Chafin
published
3.54
Gwenda Priest
published 4
3.51
Peter Glud
published
3.46
Keevie Martin
published
3.45
Evelyn Strader
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Suzanne Rudy
published
2.98
George Clutts
published 3.5
Robin Andree
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evelyn Strader + Peter Glud3448% gamesnot enough data
Robin Andree + Keevie Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Lynn Chafin
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
4
Gwenda Priest
2W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Peter Glud
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
Keevie Martin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
4
Evelyn Strader
66W–110L career · 3 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
Suzanne Rudy
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
3.37
3.5
George Clutts
0W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
2.98
Robin Andree
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.