Teams

WP RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-19vs WP GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHilary Marano / Angela Hedgepeth vs Lena Capra / Lisa OConnor6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachael Costain vs Emily Loyd6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusie Morgan / Belinda Nelson vs Natalie Hirschfeld / Shannon Isaacs7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Calle / Heather Froehlich-Olmsted vs Amy Newman / Julie Snyder3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-07-12vs CACM REDLost 04
L#1 DoublesAngela Hedgepeth / Susie Morgan vs Katie Reed / Emily Cunningham3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKristin Loudis vs Caroline Carolan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Jones / Karen Calle vs Angie Shappell / Anne Brehmer2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Froehlich-Olmsted / Sissel Eckenhausen vs Megan Ryall / Alison Finley6-7, 0-6
2021-07-05vs DTC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRachael Costain / Hilary Marano vs Susie Kokoska / Elaine Yang2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKristin Loudis vs Sheryl Glubok6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Chen / Belinda Nelson vs Lara Merriken / Cynthia Mix7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAnna Jones / Sissel Eckenhausen vs Katy Curry / Nancy Alterman4-6, 2-6
2021-06-28vs CACM BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesKim Chen / Hilary Marano vs Pamela Watson / Carlie Odau6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachael Costain vs Kit Demko6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSissel Eckenhausen / Anna Jones vs Jill Barghelame / Andrea Gordon1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBelinda Nelson / Kristin Loudis vs Kara Boulanger / Alison Zuckert2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-06-21vs GTC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesSusie Morgan / Hilary Marano vs Helen Coons / Kendra Krauss6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRachael Costain vs Catherine Calder6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKim Chen / Kristin Loudis vs Amy Day / Jessica Sanderson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBelinda Nelson / Karen Calle vs Hanh Phi / Lani Reichardt6-4, 7-6
2021-06-14vs CHCC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusie Morgan / Hilary Marano vs Adrine Writer / Kelly Osborn6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRachael Costain vs Stephanie Stewart6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnna Jones / Sissel Eckenhausen vs Wendy Croney / Lisa Pavlakis7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKim Chen / Heather Froehlich-Olmsted vs Marcy White / Kimberly Siegel6-2, 6-0
2021-06-07vs SKY BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesHilary Marano / Rachael Costain vs Heather Mills / Sarah Massena6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesKim Chen vs Mimi Pomeranz1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBelinda Nelson / Angela Hedgepeth vs Brooke Burgamy / Karen Guzzetta1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Loudis / Karen Calle vs Andrea Sykora / Jane Gonnella6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Hilary Marano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Rachael Costain
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.69
Kim Chen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.68
Karen Calle
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Belinda Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Kristin Loudis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.36
Heather Froehlich-Olmsted
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.00
Sissel Eckenhausen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Angela Hedgepeth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susie Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Froehlich-Olmsted + Hilary Marano3357% games+7.2% vs expected
Kim Chen + Kristin Loudis2646% games−3.6% vs expected
Sissel Eckenhausen + Kristin Loudis2643% games−4.0% vs expected
Belinda Nelson + Kim Chen123 matchesnot enough data
Belinda Nelson + Kristin Loudis033 matchesnot enough data
Belinda Nelson + Susie Morgan213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Froehlich-Olmsted + Karen Calle123 matchesnot enough data
Hilary Marano + Rachael Costain213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hilary Marano
44W–17L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Rachael Costain
27W–35L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Kim Chen
57W–57L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Karen Calle
41W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Belinda Nelson
24W–39L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.50
4
Kristin Loudis
60W–84L career · 5 lines in 2021
78%22%<1%
3.40
4
Heather Froehlich-Olmsted
50W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Sissel Eckenhausen
51W–86L career · 4 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
3.00
Angela Hedgepeth
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susie Morgan
12W–11L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.