Teams

Etzold (Royal Palm)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.5 Adult Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Jennifer Levin
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.55
Doris Sullivan
published
3.48
Ana Thompson
published 3.5
3.41
Kim Giles
published
3.34
Eunice McCann
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Tracey Spiegelman
published 3.5
3.30
Brenda Salgado
published 3.5
3.27
Amy Saphier
published 3.5
3.25
Nancy Feldman
published
3.24
ISABEL RICO PASTOR
published
3.24
Monika Martins
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.23
Ana Etzold
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.23
Angelica Abud
published 3.5
3.15
Rosy Bild
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.10
Robin Zagorski
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jeanne Bashein
published
Tere Aloma
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Giles + Brenda Salgado7159% games+7.4% vs expected
Kim Giles + Jennifer Levin6263% games+6.7% vs expected
Tracey Spiegelman + Brenda Salgado2349% games+4.3% vs expected
Ana Etzold + Jennifer Levin13854% games+3.1% vs expected
Ana Etzold + Tracey Spiegelman81250% games+2.3% vs expected
Ana Etzold + Eunice McCann11458% games−7.7% vs expected
Rosy Bild + Tracey Spiegelman8559% gamesnot enough data
Monika Martins + Rosy Bild4748% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Levin
78W–71L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Doris Sullivan
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
3.5
Ana Thompson
18W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Kim Giles
21W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Eunice McCann
178W–120L career · 12 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Tracey Spiegelman
66W–90L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Brenda Salgado
25W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Amy Saphier
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Nancy Feldman
10W–17L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
ISABEL RICO PASTOR
19W–29L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Monika Martins
54W–67L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Ana Etzold
166W–121L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Angelica Abud
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Rosy Bild
90W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Robin Zagorski
34W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jeanne Bashein
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tere Aloma
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.