Teams

Still Having Fun

2022 NOVA Adult 65 & Over Women · NOVA Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-08-13vs Team BoondocksLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Trimble / Chrystal Goonewardene vs Joan Donoghue / Debbie Kem0-6, 2-6
2022-08-08vs Team KissalWon 10
W#2 DoublesChrystal Goonewardene / Judy Lum vs Cynthia Lavoie / Audrey McCarthy4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-07-30vs Golden Tiger EyeLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Garcia / Chrystal Goonewardene vs Sachi Pilkenton / Rosanne Johnston4-6, 4-3
2022-07-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNancy Trimble / DIANE BEST vs Christine Driscoll / Lynn Koggan2-6, 4-6
2022-07-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChrystal Goonewardene / Nancy Trimble vs Tamara Vetter / Molly Magee3-6, 3-6
2022-07-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesJan Brito / Chrystal Goonewardene vs Margaret Dore / Doreen Reilly6-4, 7-5
2022-07-10vs Team BoondocksWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Pugh / Nancy Trimble vs Judi Shoemaker / Joyce Johnston1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-06-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Trimble / Min Chen vs Amy Siegel / Tamara Vetter3-6, 5-5
2022-06-21vs Golden Tiger EyeWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Trimble / Chrystal Goonewardene vs Yuri Miller / Lori Fisher6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 65 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Elizabeth Pugh
published 3.5
3.33
Nancy Cooper
published
3.02
Amy Horton
published 3.5
2.97
Chrystal Goonewardene
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Trimble
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Marjorie Goldman
published
Mazie Efinger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Trimble + Chrystal Goonewardene3643% games−9.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Pugh
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%18%82%
3.62
Nancy Cooper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Amy Horton
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Chrystal Goonewardene
33W–41L career · 6 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Nancy Trimble
252W–415L career · 6 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Marjorie Goldman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mazie Efinger
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.