Teams

RFL:All In:Walsh/Danton

2024 NCT Adult 40 & Over Women Spring Day · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women 1

10 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-23vs EHTC:Forty Love:Russell/LundyWon 31
W#1 DoublesMaureen Vaughn / Liz Donnelly vs Patria Disla / Becky Freiberg6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMarcie Danton vs Yadira Russell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Walsh / Erin Sloat vs Vicki Schaar / Judith Sutton6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJudith Mason / Katharine Kluger vs Jill Kehl / Stephanie Gaidos2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-05-16vs FV:Get a Grip:Espeso/HoffmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesLiz Donnelly / Maureen Vaughn vs Monica Hoffman / Samantha Doering6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarcie Danton / Julie Walsh vs Suzanne Petersen / Paula Smyth3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatharine Kluger / Janet Traceski vs Christie Kania / Nay Nassar2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-25vs (Q) MRC:Summer Dream Team:bandak/Split 22
W#1 DoublesMaureen Vaughn / Heather Vickery vs Mina Kim / Trish Rosa6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesMarcie Danton vs Ana Murray6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Walsh / Judith Mason vs Kim Bandak / Laurie Walls4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKatharine Kluger / Janet Traceski vs Jill Vitti / Nancy Hawley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLiz Donnelly / Heather Vickery vs Michelle Foard / Susan Anderson6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMarcie Danton vs Kirsten Ondrick6-0, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaureen Vaughn / Judith Mason vs Carol MacColl / Marie Roncalli6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesErin Sloat / Katharine Kluger vs Deborah Hardy / Lucy Hartry6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-04vs BTC:Honey Deuces:Wright/O'BrienWon 31
W#1 DoublesLiz Donnelly / Maureen Vaughn vs Linda Wright / Laura O'Brien6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMarcie Danton vs Veronica Grubin6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErin Sloat / Katharine Kluger vs Saija Kilkki / Roxane Fromson6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulie Walsh / Robin Defina vs Elizabeth Cushman / Elyse Post Perez1-6, 1-6
2024-03-28vs (Q) BSF:Daytime Swingers:Haverty/Won 31
L#1 DoublesErin Sloat / Heather Vickery vs Christine Abreu / Teresa Barton7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMarcie Danton vs Sara Loughman6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJudith Mason / Katharine Kluger vs Jennifer Haverty / Leah Schaff6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Walsh / Robin Defina vs Dianne Rothenberg / Kristen Bachorowski6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RFL:All In:Walsh/Danton0616818175
2(Q) ETC:Scared Hitless Too:Philbin/Roncalli06141023205
3BTC:Honey Deuces:Wright/O'Brien06131125227
4FV:Get a Grip:Espeso/Hoffman06111327205
5(Q) BSF:Daytime Swingers:Haverty/06111330231
6(Q) MRC:Summer Dream Team:bandak/06101332241
7EHTC:Forty Love:Russell/Lundy0681536257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Heather Vickery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Marcie Danton
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.53
Liz Donnelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Robin Defina
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Maureen Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.36
Judith Mason
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Erin Sloat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Julie Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.93
Katharine Kluger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Traceski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Vickery + Liz Donnelly8063% games+7.9% vs expected
Liz Donnelly + Maureen Vaughn10363% games+6.6% vs expected
Robin Defina + Julie Walsh6354% games−0.9% vs expected
Robin Defina + Erin Sloat3353% games−2.2% vs expected
Erin Sloat + Julie Walsh9750% games−2.6% vs expected
Erin Sloat + Maureen Vaughn111545% games−5.1% vs expected
Julie Walsh + Maureen Vaughn4747% games−5.3% vs expected
Judith Mason + Julie Walsh224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Vickery
55W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
Marcie Danton
83W–59L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.59
Liz Donnelly
52W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
Robin Defina
27W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Maureen Vaughn
58W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Judith Mason
72W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.36
Erin Sloat
99W–90L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Julie Walsh
125W–109L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Katharine Kluger
37W–61L career · 6 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.93
Janet Traceski
16W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.