Teams

GTC GOLD

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-12vs APR-E YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Henry / Alexander Morawski vs Bruce Eldredge / William Mahaffy5-7, 3-2
L#1 SinglesIan Ross vs Shawn Morgan4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRoger Freeman / Humberto Preciado vs Joshua Rozman / Mark Kruk6-3, 6-1
2024-08-28vs GTC NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Hull / Humberto Preciado vs Roger Montoya / Suresh Gevaran3-6, 5-7
2024-08-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHumberto Preciado / John Henry vs Andrew Morgan / Zachary Morgan4-6, 2-6
2024-08-07vs SKY ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesHumberto Preciado / Steve Fisher vs Bob Sullivan / Kendrick McLish6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-24vs WP ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Henry / Humberto Preciado vs Lionel Pomerantz / Chad Whitmer3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Adam Coleman
published 4
3.77
John Henry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ian Ross
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Steve Fisher
published
3.65
Roger Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Humberto Preciado
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.58
Alexander Morawski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
James Hull
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Henry + Humberto Preciado2352% games−2.1% vs expected
Humberto Preciado + James Hull5258% gamesnot enough data
Roger Freeman + James Hull2440% gamesnot enough data
Roger Freeman + Humberto Preciado5064% gamesnot enough data
John Henry + Roger Freeman213 matchesnot enough data
Ian Ross + James Hull123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adam Coleman
27W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
John Henry
41W–21L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ian Ross
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Steve Fisher
29W–31L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
Roger Freeman
35W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Humberto Preciado
62W–48L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Alexander Morawski
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
James Hull
25W–30L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.