Teams

OC Mixed Troubles - LNRC - Mehta

2022 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

21 players · average NTRP 4.54 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesShan Sondhu / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits vs Katie Moore / Victor Wu4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShan Sondhu / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits vs Ariel Lee / John Rabalais6-3, 6-2
2022-01-15vs OC - LPC - Sally -Lost 01
L#3 DoublesChris Lee / Sabrina MacLachlan vs Stella Nguyen Bezabeh / Andre Law7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 9.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.97
Erynne Mercado
published 5
4.96
Maggie Mello Harrah
published
Dunya Ahrns
published 5
4.72
Benay Weintraub
published 5
4.55
Ryan Fabre
published
4.46
Amanda Varela
published 5
4.36
Alissa Ahlman
published 4.5
4.28
Daniel Beres
published 4.5
Dustin Hladek
published 4.5
George Thaung
published 4.5
4.20
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.11
Justin Green
published
4.07
Noh Jin Park
published
4.06
Avinash Mehta
published 4
3.87
Ayako Hasegawa
published 4
3.73
Robert Samson
published
3.71
Sabrina MacLachlan
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Matt Dubow
published
Shan Sondhu
published
Stephen Vangelos
published
Taran Sondhu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Erynne Mercado
11W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
4.97
Maggie Mello Harrah
14W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
4.96
5
Dunya Ahrns
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
5
Benay Weintraub
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
4.72
Ryan Fabre
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
4.55
5
Amanda Varela
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
4.46
4.5
Alissa Ahlman
28W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Daniel Beres
17W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Dustin Hladek
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
George Thaung
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
84W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
Justin Green
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.11
Noh Jin Park
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Avinash Mehta
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
4.06
4
Ayako Hasegawa
64W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
Robert Samson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Sabrina MacLachlan
190W–130L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Matt Dubow
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shan Sondhu
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Vangelos
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Taran Sondhu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.