Teams

Petaluma TA/Horne/Petaluma

2026 MIXED 65&Over · 65&Over MX7.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesMichael Getzell / Kathy Harold vs Pamela Maloney / Peter Snowden3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Kent / Marti Gerstner vs Stephanie Law / Jerry McCormick6-3, 6-3
2026-07-26vs Solano County TA/Groh/VacavilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Kent / Marti Gerstner vs Linda Imrie / Russell Groh6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Getzell / Kathy Harold vs Anne Thurston / Samuel Brown3-6, 1-6
2026-07-25vs SF Tennis Friends/Gee/SFLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Getzell / Kathy Harold vs Peter Sanchez / Xiao Liu6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Kent / Marti Gerstner vs Eric Rasmussen / Midori Tanaka Atkins3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Horne / Patsy Love vs Jerry Cheng / Paula Mangin1-6, 1-6
2026-07-25vs Flip Side Tennis/Albar/Foster CityLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Getzell / Kathy Harold vs Leo Simone / Gerry Sadang1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Kent / Marti Gerstner vs Bing Hattori / Jaime Pagmanua7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChristopher Horne / Patsy Love vs Theresa Menard / Peter Watkins2-6, 0-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 65&Over MX7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SF Tennis Friends/Gee/SF40102580
2Flip Side Tennis/Albar/Foster City31751192
3Rafael Racketeers/McCarthy/San Rafael318412109
4Kiss My Ace/McBee/Walnut Creek226614117
5Solano County TA/Groh/Vacaville134816109
6Valley Vista RC/Polidori/Walnut Creek134818120
7Petaluma TA/Horne/Petaluma043918129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Marti Gerstner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Jeffrey Kent
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Kathy Harold
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Christopher Horne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Michael Getzell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Patsy Love
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Horne + Patsy Love044 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Kent + Marti Gerstner314 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Harold + Michael Getzell044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marti Gerstner
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Jeffrey Kent
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Kathy Harold
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Christopher Horne
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Michael Getzell
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patsy Love
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.