Teams

FISHEL/ NIX - A. FARMS

2023 Loudoun Adult 18 & Over Women · Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-02vs KAPLAN/ ZIMMERMAN - AVSPLost 01
L#2 DoublesPaige Fishel / Michelle Tenhaeff vs Debbie McCully / Melissa Johnson6-7, 3-6
2023-05-23vs ROELLIG - A. FARMSLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristina Schinner / Jennifer East vs Kristin Clark / Kim Klimkiewicz0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Cardiff / Tina Woods vs Jutta Nohra / Betsy Johnston2-6, 4-6
2023-05-19vs PARK/ GABALDON - A. FARMSLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Deann Zoghlin vs Kathleen Eickelberg / Kimberly Pease3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMichelle Tenhaeff vs Terry Cocozza2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJosephine Hughes / Kimberly Murray vs Margaret Navin / Lyn Fay0-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Deann Zoghlin vs Catherine Mitchell / Jill Poretz6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJill Brown / Maria Svenningsen vs Mary Ann Larson / Maureen Bornholdt7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPamela Nix / Michelle Tenhaeff vs Susan Speciale / Natalia Hozdevila2-6, 2-6
2023-05-08vs KAPLAN/ ZIMMERMAN - AVSPLost 12
L#2 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Deann Zoghlin vs Kate Donadoni / Debbie McCully5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMichelle Tenhaeff vs Cathy TAYLOR0-4
L#3 DoublesCarrie Cardiff / Susan Lombardi vs Eve Weber / Kathy Hoehner7-6, 3-5
W#1 DoublesJennifer East / Christina Schinner vs Wendy Hopkins / Polly Middleton6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Cardiff / Susan Lombardi vs Maureen Bornholdt / Tara Brill6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMargaret Amy Flaherty / Josephine Hughes vs Kendall Mccaughey / Susan Speciale1-6, 2-6
2023-04-21vs ROELLIG - A. FARMSLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarisa Dueweke / Jill Brown vs Christina Brockman / Gretchen MacMillan5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristina Schinner vs Emma Shine3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKate Putt / Carrie Cardiff vs Jutta Nohra / Betsy Johnston3-6, 3-6
2023-04-14vs PARK/ GABALDON - A. FARMSLost 02
L#2 DoublesMaria Svenningsen / Tina Woods vs Brenda Bosch / Margaret Navin4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Fishel / Pamela Nix vs Denise Jack - (DQ)* / Paula Elmore2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Christina Schinner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.80
Laura Naramore
published
Bethe Halpern
published 4
3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.61
Maria Svenningsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Deann Zoghlin
published 4
3.55
Carrie Cardiff
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Jennifer East
published
3.36
Tina Le
published
3.29
Michelle Tenhaeff
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Pamela Nix
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Kathleen McFarlane
published
3.25
Carisa Dueweke
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.19
Kate Putt
published
3.13
Kimberly Murray
published
3.08
3.08
Josephine Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
Susan Lombardi
published
Tina Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Nix + Michelle Tenhaeff8750% games−3.7% vs expected
Carrie Cardiff + Christina Schinner7067% gamesnot enough data
Josephine Hughes + Kimberly Murray033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Schinner
227W–98L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Laura Naramore
17W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Bethe Halpern
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Maria Svenningsen
71W–68L career · 2 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Deann Zoghlin
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Carrie Cardiff
90W–60L career · 8 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.55
Jennifer East
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.43
Tina Le
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Michelle Tenhaeff
306W–196L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Pamela Nix
193W–201L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Kathleen McFarlane
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
4
Carisa Dueweke
74W–148L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.25
Kate Putt
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Kimberly Murray
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.13
Margaret Amy Flaherty
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Josephine Hughes
76W–105L career · 7 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
Susan Lombardi
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tina Woods
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.