Teams

No Love

2025 Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over · Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-02vs Serving YouLost 02
L#1 DoublesMartha Givan / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Angela Curry / Donna Garland3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNola Shelton / Gale Powell vs Leslie Fields / Joani Clay3-6, 3-6
2025-08-02vs Court JestersLost 03
L#1 DoublesFernanda Brown / Julie Anderson vs Justine Handelman / Angela Sharma1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGale Powell vs Emily Schabacker0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNola Shelton / Krista Flanagan vs Kathleen Eder / Kim Cooper2-6, 1-1
2025-07-30vs LoVV 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Pedersen / Fernanda Brown vs Plezzie Heade / Constance Manning3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGale Powell vs ANEESAH WILLIAMS2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesGwendolyn Vauss / Nola Shelton vs Sheila Jennings / Tammie Wiley6-3, 6-4
2025-07-29vs Serving YouLost 01
L#2 DoublesGwendolyn Vauss / Fernanda Brown vs April Copes / Linda Clowe0-6, 2-6
2025-07-25vs LoVV 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGale Powell / Philippa Davis vs Tammie Wiley / ANEESAH WILLIAMS3-6, 4-6
2025-07-11vs Lady Acers 3.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Pedersen / Gwendolyn Vauss vs Annette James / Lenora Spencer1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesFernanda Brown / Julie Anderson vs Tjuana Jenkins / Tosha Clark0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Kimberly Pedersen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Nola Shelton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.51
Gale Powell
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Martha Givan
published
2.39
Fernanda Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.37
Gwendolyn Vauss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gwendolyn Vauss + Gale Powell31039% games−8.3% vs expected
Gwendolyn Vauss + Nola Shelton134 matchesnot enough data
Gwendolyn Vauss + Kimberly Pedersen123 matchesnot enough data
Nola Shelton + Kimberly Pedersen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kimberly Pedersen
51W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Nola Shelton
28W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Gale Powell
36W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
Martha Givan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Fernanda Brown
15W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.39
3
Gwendolyn Vauss
43W–122L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.