Teams

Las Posas CC

2025 SoCal Tri-Level 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesCarter Erickson / Brent Wakatsuki vs Ryan Flahaven / Christopher Smith7-6, 7-6
2025-09-13vs Sunset Hills High TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarter Erickson / Brent Wakatsuki vs Gary Nunes / David Thompson6-3, 6-2
2025-08-24vs Wood Ranch Tri BallersLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarter Erickson / Brent Wakatsuki vs Renaldo Goncalves / Saeed Saed3-6, 5-7
2025-08-16vs Spanish Hills Hi TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarter Erickson / Brent Wakatsuki vs David Tovar / Joseph Root6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCarter Erickson / Brent Wakatsuki vs Jonathan Fersht / Ryan Flahaven3-6, 3-6
2025-07-26vs Sunset Hills High TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Lieb / Brent Wakatsuki vs David Spellerberg / Gary Nunes6-2, 6-4
2025-07-12vs Spanish Hills Hi TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarter Erickson / Mark McCampbell vs Joseph Root / Max Beaudry6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Gary Lieb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.26
Mark McCampbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Carter Erickson
published 4.5
4.23
Chad Colby
published 4.5
4.20
Brent Wakatsuki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.92
Craig Myers
published 4
3.87
Edwin Ramirez
published
3.81
Paul Hiepler
published
3.63
Winston Deardorff
published
3.49
Erik Lundring
published
3.38
Todd Blackmoore
published
3.36
Jon Boring
published
3.22
William Dobbins
published
3.19
Walter Burstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Wakatsuki + Carter Erickson3260% games+5.8% vs expected
William Dobbins + Todd Blackmoore8356% games−1.1% vs expected
Brent Wakatsuki + Gary Lieb12652% games−1.9% vs expected
Mark McCampbell + Gary Lieb4352% games−7.2% vs expected
William Dobbins + Walter Burstein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gary Lieb
77W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Mark McCampbell
43W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Carter Erickson
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
4.5
Chad Colby
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Brent Wakatsuki
107W–112L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
4
Craig Myers
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Edwin Ramirez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
Paul Hiepler
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Winston Deardorff
3W–19L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Erik Lundring
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Todd Blackmoore
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jon Boring
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
William Dobbins
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
Walter Burstein
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.