Teams

Beaufort/TLC

Fall League 18 & Over · Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-14vs Fall/BBTL/HuntWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlan Mock / David Riedmayer vs Ronald Logan / Alexander Hunt7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike Cherry / David Fancher vs Jerry Wayne / Gordon Crenshaw6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAaron Callahan / Everett Dwyer vs Jim Still / Kristian Santos6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-12-07vs Fall/BBTL/HuntWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Cherry / David Fancher vs Kristian Santos / Michael Reich6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Riedmayer / Alan Mock vs Scott Sonoc / Tim Moore6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMurray Steen / Aaron Callahan vs Jerry Wayne / Kenneth Wessels6-2, 6-2
2024-11-23vs Fall/BBTL/HuntWon 30
W#1 DoublesMike Cherry / David Fancher vs Ronald Logan / Jim Still6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRandy Marcotte / Alan Mock vs Scott Sonoc / Michael Reich6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMurray Steen / Chris Mixson vs Jerry Wayne / Tim Moore5-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Alan Mock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Randy Marcotte
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Mixson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Fancher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
David Riedmayer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Kevin Cain
published
3.24
Aaron Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Everett Dwyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Scott Jennings
published
Mike Cherry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Murray Steen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Cherry + David Fancher303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alan Mock
34W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Randy Marcotte
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Chris Mixson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3.5
David Fancher
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
David Riedmayer
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Cain
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Aaron Callahan
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Everett Dwyer
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Scott Jennings
4W–15L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.04
Mike Cherry
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Murray Steen
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.