Teams

Life Time - Haladwala

2025 B'ham Combo - Adult 40 & Over Weeknight · 6.5 Men - Monday

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-03vs BH 6.5M 40 & Over (Williams)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Haladwala / George Casey vs Clay Williams / Matt Grill4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChris Fields / Patrick Denney vs Matthew Smith / David Thompson5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKane Burnette / Ramakrishnan Ramakrishnan Subramanian vs Troy Hendrixson / Tad Templeton1-6, 4-6
2025-08-27vs BH 6.5M 40 & Over (Ingram)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Fields / Ed Bauer vs Daryl Ingram / Paul Ebert3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesByrne Stewart / Paul Vercher vs Chad Miller / Matt Heydinger2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesScott Mansfield / George Casey vs Jay Gilchrist / Richard Shirley6-4, 6-0
2025-08-13vs BH 6.5M 40 & Over (Williams)Won 21
L#1 DoublesScott Mansfield / George Casey vs Clay Williams / Matt Grill2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMark Haladwala / Chris Fields vs Nathan Hefner / Tony LaRussa6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Cordell / Byrne Stewart vs David Reeves / William McCarty6-2, 6-1
2025-08-06vs BH 6.5M 40 & Over (Ingram)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Faircloth / Scott Mansfield vs Edric Williams / Warner Huh6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGeorge Casey / Ed Bauer vs Tray Ivey / Richard Shirley3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChris Fields / Patrick Denney vs Daryl Ingram / Danny Slovensky3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-07-16vs BH 6.5M 40 & Over (Ingram)Won 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Vercher / Ed Bauer vs Terry Pouncey / Tray Ivey7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesByrne Stewart / Brian Faircloth vs Danny Slovensky / Warner Huh6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKane Burnette / Ramakrishnan Ramakrishnan Subramanian vs Joseph Osborn / Jay Gilchrist4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men - Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Tyler Welch
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Brian Faircloth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Allen Porter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
George Casey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.35
Michael Cordell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.33
Ramakrishnan Ramakrishnan Subramanian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Byrne Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Chris Fields
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Patrick Denney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Paul Vercher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Mark Haladwala
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Kane Burnette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Scott Mansfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Ed Bauer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Faircloth + Tyler Welch14464% games+8.6% vs expected
Ed Bauer + Mark Haladwala14356% games+7.8% vs expected
George Casey + Allen Porter4257% games+5.7% vs expected
Patrick Denney + Mark Haladwala1443% games−0.4% vs expected
Allen Porter + Tyler Welch4170% gamesnot enough data
Ed Bauer + Patrick Denney314 matchesnot enough data
Mark Haladwala + Chris Fields134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Cordell + George Casey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Welch
36W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Brian Faircloth
30W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Allen Porter
31W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
George Casey
43W–41L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.38
Michael Cordell
28W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
Ramakrishnan Ramakrishnan Subramanian
43W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Byrne Stewart
23W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Chris Fields
24W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Patrick Denney
48W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
Paul Vercher
29W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Mark Haladwala
44W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Kane Burnette
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Scott Mansfield
21W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Ed Bauer
35W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.