Teams

Martin 4.0

2021 Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-06-29vs Schneider/AvalloneWon 10
W#2 DoublesMesanie Lee / Dina Caddeo vs Lisa Dennis / Mary Wallace6-1, 6-1
2021-06-14vs WT&FSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Yannone / Angela Thorpe vs Ginger Vance / Lisa Shay0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDina Caddeo / Sharon Richardson vs Jill Lehr / Margaret Butler2-0
2021-06-10vs Schneider/AvalloneSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSharon Richardson / Dina Caddeo vs Grace Schneider / Fernanda la Rocca6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCassandra West / Christine Driscoll vs Beth Hiltabidle / Lisa Dennis4-6, 4-6
2021-06-06vs Chili PeppersLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Freeman / Karen Yannone vs Lisa Thompson / Joanne Connelly3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDina Caddeo / Sharon Richardson vs Jennifer Noronha / Ashley Doot Vaughn6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCassandra West / Christine Driscoll vs Elizabeth Baker / Tami Burt5-7, 1-6
2021-05-26vs BontempoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDina Caddeo / Sharon Richardson vs Karen Anderson / Joi Remoll6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Albers / Mesanie Lee vs Anne Bolduc / Terri Mrozinski4-6, 3-6
2021-05-22vs BernsteinLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Daggett / Linda Halstead vs Janet Miller / Cindy Mexcur1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDina Caddeo / Sharon Richardson vs Jennifer Sheridan / Jeannie Park7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMesanie Lee / Kim Neiss vs Sara Vance / Kerry McQuighan2-6, 6-7
2021-05-19vs Chili PeppersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRebecca Sellassie / Kim Neiss vs Ashley Doot Vaughn / Sarah Featherstone2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesDina Caddeo / Sharon Richardson vs Heather Zimmerman / Laura Quandt6-0, 6-3
2021-05-15vs The Vicious VolliesLost 02
L#2 DoublesKaren Yannone / Angela Thorpe vs Michele Adams / Mia Piansay4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJenny Lopez / Cassandra West vs Tia Sanchez / Ellen Collins7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-02vs WT&FLost 02
L#1 DoublesDina Caddeo / Helen Patterson vs Kasey Kinney / Lisa Shay1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKim Neiss / Cassandra West vs Robin Pippin / Monica Maloney2-6, 3-6
2021-04-30vs ButcherWon 30
W#1 DoublesDina Caddeo / Sharon Richardson vs Megan Barroll / Shana Ahmad6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHelen Patterson / Melissa Albers vs Amy Dawson / Jessica Butcher6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKim Neiss / Karen Yannone vs Melissa Hayes / Pamela Davis6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-18vs Party at the NetLost 13
W#1 DoublesHelen Patterson / Melissa Albers vs Belinda McLean / Rachel Price6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Yannone / Linda Halstead vs Julie Dixon / Marie Thorne1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTamara Hayes vs Lauren Procaccini4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDina Caddeo / Sharon Richardson vs Dawn Bach / Kathy Crowley3-6, 2-6
2021-04-11vs BernsteinLost 02
L#2 DoublesMelissa Albers / Mesanie Lee vs Melanie Bernstein / Shalita Williams4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDina Caddeo / Christine Driscoll vs Kerry McQuighan / Pamela Lewnes6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Anne Marie Peterson
published 4.5
3.70
Helen Patterson
published 4
3.46
Dina Caddeo
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.31
Karen Yannone
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.27
Mesanie Lee
published
3.24
Lynn Daggett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Kim Neiss
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
3.08
Melissa Albers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.98
Tamara Hayes
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Cassandra West
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
Leigh Deeter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dina Caddeo + Cassandra West314 matchesnot enough data
Dina Caddeo + Helen Patterson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Marie Peterson
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Helen Patterson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.70
4
Dina Caddeo
138W–171L career · 11 lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Karen Yannone
178W–151L career · 16 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
Mesanie Lee
26W–27L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Lynn Daggett
46W–64L career · 1 line in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kim Neiss
40W–62L career · 5 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.14
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Melissa Albers
86W–110L career · 10 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Tamara Hayes
78W–73L career · 6 lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Cassandra West
64W–68L career · 14 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
Leigh Deeter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.