Teams

CCV-Reifsnider

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-05-31vs SCC NoblesWon 10
W#3 DoublesHayes Blackburn / Kirsti Goodwin vs Erin Garrett / Carla Shaffer6-4, 6-3
2024-05-17vs Raintree- LloydWon 10
W#2 DoublesAllison Purcell / Kirsti Goodwin vs Mona Stahling / Lydia Smith6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Megan Hodges
published
4.00
3.77
Hayes Blackburn
published
3.76
Allison Purcell
published 4
3.71
Emily Gottwald
published
3.63
3.44
Anne Taylor Schaaf
published 3.5
Charlotte Clarkson
published 3.5
3.23
Lia Mooney
published
3.01
Kirsti Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Elizabeth Toohers
published
Ginnie Price
published
Jennifer Levy
published
Kim Cressy
published
Patsy King
published
Robin Reifsnider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Benevento + Megan Hodges404 matchesnot enough data
Hayes Blackburn + Megan Hodges303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Hodges
19W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Catherine Benevento
13W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
4.00
Hayes Blackburn
11W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Alexandra Huffman
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Allison Purcell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Emily Gottwald
19W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.71
3.5
Cary Campbell-Knight
17W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.63
3.5
Anne Taylor Schaaf
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Charlotte Clarkson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lia Mooney
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Kirsti Goodwin
56W–53L career · 2 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Elizabeth Toohers
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ginnie Price
14W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Levy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kim Cressy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patsy King
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robin Reifsnider
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.