Teams

Ichen

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER EARLY START · 4.5 MEN

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesJonah Zimmer / Brad Walter vs Ryan Reid / Matthew Royer6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesJosh Ichen vs Joseph Janes3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAn Phan / Matthew Lindsay vs Tomas Benzo / Brandon Schaner6-1, 7-5
2024-12-04vs KindlerWon 40
W#1 DoublesNicholas Stan / Andrew Spence vs Chris Kindler / Nathaniel Gier6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAnish Singh vs David Yesilevskiy1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJonah Zimmer / Brad Walter vs Riley Washington / John Leehy6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMatthew Lindsay vs Jay Knutson6-4, 6-2
2024-11-20vs Cychosz/Radermacher Fall BallWon 32
W#1 DoublesAnish Singh / Nicholas Stan vs David Casperson / Robert Cardenas6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJosh Ichen vs Kenny Goins2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrad Walter / Jonah Zimmer vs Kenneth Cychosz / Ryan Ortega6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMatthew Lindsay vs Trent Chaffee7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAndrew Spence / Phillip Knopp vs Brian Brown / Carter Springer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-11-13vs Kuether: HammiesWon 31
W#1 SinglesJosh Ichen vs Isa Kibira2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Spence / Jonah Zimmer vs Sean Le / Mekdim Dejene3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMatthew Lindsay vs Wesley Saunders6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPhillip Knopp / An Phan vs Tou Ger Xiong / Koua Yang0-6, 0-6
2024-11-06vs Hilpert/Bates 18+ ES25Lost 23
L#1 DoublesAndrew Spence / Nicholas Stan vs Ben Wilson / Alex King4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJosh Ichen vs Connor O'Meara6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrad Walter / Jonah Zimmer vs Larson Ringlien / Tucker Combs4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMatthew Lindsay vs Kevin Hilpert4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAn Phan / Phillip Knopp vs Lewis Wilcox / Tyler Bates2-6, 1-6
2024-10-30vs Raver/Hanson ESWon 31
W#1 DoublesJosh Ichen / Anish Singh vs Aaron Johnson / Matthew Crosby6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAndrew Spence vs Andrew Argall2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBrad Walter / Nicholas Stan vs Erik Gustafson / Christopher Toal6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTimothy Kang / Jonah Zimmer vs Benjamin Colburn / Mark van Ert6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-16vs Haller Baseliners 2025 Early StartLost 13
L#1 DoublesAnish Singh / Andrew Spence vs Ethan Ahrar / Jackson Meyer6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJosh Ichen vs Brett Eliason6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNicholas Stan / Timothy Kang vs Christopher Haller / Matthew Royer3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAn Phan / Matthew Lindsay vs Brandon Schaner / Curt Hedin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-09vs KindlerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNicholas Stan / Anish Singh vs Chris Kindler / Alex Mattson6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJonah Zimmer vs David Yesilevskiy1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Brad Walter
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.38
Anish Singh
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.35
Matthew Lindsay
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.27
Andrew Spence
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.12
Jonah Zimmer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
3.82
An Phan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Josh Ichen
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Nicholas Stan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Timothy Kang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonah Zimmer + Brad Walter9560% games+9.1% vs expected
Anish Singh + Nicholas Stan2652% games−7.1% vs expected
Anish Singh + Brad Walter224 matchesnot enough data
An Phan + Jonah Zimmer404 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Spence + Jonah Zimmer213 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Kang + Jonah Zimmer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brad Walter
22W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Anish Singh
24W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
4.38
Matthew Lindsay
24W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Andrew Spence
12W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Jonah Zimmer
24W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
4
An Phan
19W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Josh Ichen
10W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicholas Stan
6W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Kang
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.