Teams

NMeredith (Carmel)

2024 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 5.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-01vs JFontaine/TInga (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaige Jones / Keri Beach vs Nancy Liu / Alicia Su1-6, 2-6
2024-09-24vs SBurke/CKlein (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesClaire Samuels / Tricia Magee vs Suzanne MacVicar / Elizabeth Scoville6-3, 6-2
2024-09-17vs ABroemel (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKeri Beach / Lara Aboulhosn vs Sara Ash / Marissa Connolly7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-09-10vs JMugnano (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTiffany Ashmore / Keri Beach vs Georgia Cook / Kimberly Wyborski6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNadia Meredith / Lara Aboulhosn vs Bridget Sivewright / Emily Pansa1-6, 1-6
2024-09-03vs JHamlin/EAnderson (Park Road)Split 11
W#2 DoublesPaige Jones / Keri Beach vs Lindsay Lillibridge / Maureen Polonus6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJulia Rafferty / Lara Aboulhosn vs Jennifer Hamlin / LARA Ferguson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-27vs JFontaine/TInga (Lifetime)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTricia Magee / Claire Samuels vs Jasmine Fontaine / Alicia Su3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Virginia Molan
published
2.99
Tricia Magee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Keri Beach
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.74
Crystal Allen
published 3
2.70
Lara Aboulhosn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.51
Claire Samuels
published 2.5
2.50
Jennifer George
published
2.40
Nadia Meredith
published
2.35
Tiffany Ashmore
published
2.28
Brooke Cole
published 2.5
2.13
Julia Rafferty
published
2.02
Cathy Nikrooz
published 2.5
Sarah Firquin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Magee + Keri Beach4265% games+13.8% vs expected
Claire Samuels + Nadia Meredith314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Virginia Molan
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.58
3
Tricia Magee
122W–94L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Keri Beach
45W–33L career · 10 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Crystal Allen
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
2.5
Lara Aboulhosn
33W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%8%92%
2.70
2.5
Claire Samuels
11W–1L career · no lines in 2024
0%48%52%
2.51
Jennifer George
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%49%51%
2.50
Nadia Meredith
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%76%24%
2.40
Tiffany Ashmore
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Brooke Cole
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28
Julia Rafferty
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Cathy Nikrooz
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Sarah Firquin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.