Teams

BM YELLOW

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-02vs HRCA-N YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Pratt / Lisa Matter vs Lauren Stone / Paige Knaub4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMorgan Brown vs Iryna Chekhovich-ott6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCathie Sanders / Sarah Lemorande vs Kelly Zinke / Jamie Fetzer6-7, 1-6
2026-09-02vs LEBTC YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Stearns / Ashley Curran vs Stephanie Auth / Sarah Veitenhaus1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLisa Matter vs Suzanne Termaat6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCathy Dziewiatkowski / Cathie Sanders vs Kristine Johnson / Adrian Schwarz1-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs KC-RH BLUESplit 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Stearns vs Nelly Chavez3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMorgan Brown / Ruchika Husa vs Lynn Kisic / Stephanie Knudson4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-08-12vs COV BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesRuchika Husa / Tina Pratt vs Alex Anden / Michelle Brassil2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMorgan Brown vs Amy Reuter6-0, 6-2
2026-08-05vs SS-LGT YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesTina Pratt / Jennifer Stearns vs Jordan Best / Taryn Iadarola2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAshley Curran / Sarah Lemorande vs Melissa Craighead / Andrea Pollack1-6, 2-6
2026-07-29vs CCC GREENSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMorgan Brown vs Kendra Gutesha1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Matter / Tina Pratt vs Elizabeth Murray / Nhung Nielsen6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Morgan Brown
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.34
Cathie Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.32
Lisa Matter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.09
Ruchika Husa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.02
Tina Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.95
Cathy Dziewiatkowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.93
Jennifer Stearns
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.88
Diane Lampe
published 2.5
1.74
Sarah Lemorande
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.65
Ashley Curran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Pratt + Jennifer Stearns2442% games−2.0% vs expected
Sarah Lemorande + Ashley Curran0521% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Matter + Tina Pratt134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Stearns + Ashley Curran044 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Lemorande + Tina Pratt033 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Lemorande + Ruchika Husa033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Morgan Brown
25W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Cathie Sanders
3W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.34
Lisa Matter
19W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
Ruchika Husa
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Tina Pratt
9W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Cathy Dziewiatkowski
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Jennifer Stearns
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
2.5
Diane Lampe
0W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Sarah Lemorande
0W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.74
2.5
Ashley Curran
0W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.