Teams

KY/LOU/Seligman/Hodges

2022 USTA TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER ADULT · Women's 3.5, 3.0, 2.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.14 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Elena Marquette
published 3.5
3.20
Sharen Hayden
published
3.18
Kristi Whistle
published
3.00
Barrie Price-Kerr
published 3.5
2.84
Sonja Bareiss
published
AMI SELIGMAN
published 3
Arina Safarova
published 3
Donna Bone
published 3
2.70
Kathryn Carter
published
2.69
Iulia Brockman
published 3
2.59
Ellen Clements
published 3
2.55
Linnette Hodges
published
2.41
Linda Rice
published
2.32
Kim Ford
published
2.28
Lynda Eveslage
published
Megan Pollitt
published
Roscelle Griffin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Marquette + Sharen Hayden3446% games−8.0% vs expected
AMI SELIGMAN + Linnette Hodges033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elena Marquette
59W–92L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Sharen Hayden
49W–55L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
Kristi Whistle
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Barrie Price-Kerr
13W–24L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Sonja Bareiss
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
AMI SELIGMAN
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Arina Safarova
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Donna Bone
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathryn Carter
17W–32L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Iulia Brockman
22W–20L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Ellen Clements
37W–43L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
Linnette Hodges
6W–18L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55
Linda Rice
7W–45L career · no lines in 2022
0%76%24%
2.41
Kim Ford
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
0%92%8%
2.32
Lynda Eveslage
1W–18L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
2.28
Megan Pollitt
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Roscelle Griffin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.