Teams

Thurston/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPAR

2026 Ruston Adult 55 & Over - Women · 3.5 Ruston (55&O) Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-03-09vs Hamilton/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPARLost 12
L#1 DoublesTiphanie Maxwell / Kim Schlessman vs Anita House / Debra Cox4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie THURSTON / Tracie Ellerman vs Laura Bennett / Christy Brown6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Eaton / Laura Smith vs Sherry Hamilton / Dana Dukes6-4, 6-4
2026-03-02vs Hamilton/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPARWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Barron / Kim Schlessman vs Anita House / Martha Lancaster6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Smith / Tracie Ellerman vs Laura Bennett / Kathy Manning6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarleen Dumas / Cindy Eaton vs Sherry Hamilton / Dana Dukes2-6, 2-6
2026-02-23vs Hamilton/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPARWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Smith / Lynn Barron vs Anita House / Martha Lancaster7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarleen Dumas / Kim Schlessman vs Laura Bennett / Christy Brown1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDebbie THURSTON / Tiphanie Maxwell vs Kathy Manning / Debra Cox6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Ruston (55&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Thurston/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPAR2154879
2Hamilton/3.5/55+/Ruston/RPAR12451084

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Tracie Ellerman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Lynn Barron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Debbie THURSTON
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Kim Schlessman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Carleen Dumas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.80
Tiphanie Maxwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Cindy Eaton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracie Ellerman
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Lynn Barron
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Debbie THURSTON
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.04
Kim Schlessman
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.98
3.5
Carleen Dumas
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.85
Tiphanie Maxwell
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Cindy Eaton
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.