Teams

RIDGEMARK G&CC CW7.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 7.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Rachel Banse
published
3.65
Julie Dean
published
3.58
Cynthia Fancher
published 4
3.44
Kim Horton
published
3.42
Tracy Taggart
published
3.38
Christine Breen
published 4
3.32
Allison Rohnert
published 3.5
3.30
Tina Clark
published
3.29
Sharon Winchester
published
3.27
Kylee Waterman
published
Bailey Rianda
published 3.5
3.19
Kathryn Tiffany
published
3.19
Kristie Solomon
published
3.18
Sandy Barker
published
2.90
2.81
Diana M Sanchez
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Clark + Kim Horton10356% games+7.6% vs expected
Kathryn Tiffany + Allison Rohnert314 matchesnot enough data
Kristie Solomon + Tina Clark314 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Barker + Tracy Taggart123 matchesnot enough data
Allison Rohnert + Kristie Solomon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Banse
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Julie Dean
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Cynthia Fancher
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Kim Horton
22W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
Tracy Taggart
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
4
Christine Breen
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
3.5
Allison Rohnert
44W–41L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Tina Clark
20W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Sharon Winchester
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
Kylee Waterman
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Bailey Rianda
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathryn Tiffany
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Kristie Solomon
29W–19L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.19
Sandy Barker
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Deborah Armstrong
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Diana M Sanchez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.